Female doctor makes vaccination to woman. They are wearing a protective face masks.

Can employers mandate the COVID-19 vaccine?

Victoria Quayle ||

It is no secret by now that a vaccination against COVID-19 has been in the works globally for a while. In Australia, Health Minister Greg Hunt has indicated that we can expect to see the vaccine by March 2021. This means that it is time for employers to start thinking about what implications this might have for their workplace, namely, can or should an employer require its employees to get the vaccine?

Currently, employers can make directions for employees to have specific vaccinations against common illnesses when they are working in high-risk environments, such as health or aged care. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers more broadly have been faced with unfamiliar risks and circumstances that have challenged the standards and rationale applicable to health-related directions in the workplace.

Fundamentally, employers will be able to issue a direction for employees to be vaccinated.

However, employers will have to apply the ‘lawful and reasonable’ standard to all directions made in this respect. That is, employers will have to ask themselves whether the vaccination is necessary to eliminate or minimise a realistic risk of COVID-19 infection in the workplace, to the extent reasonably practicable and consistent with the employer’s existing legal obligations.

The question of reasonableness in this context must be asked on a case-by-case basis, considering a variety of factors, including:

  • the nature of work being performed by particular employees;
  • the nature of the clients and other stakeholders;
  • whether employees can work remotely;
  • the advice and requirements of government and medical bodies at the time;
  • how advanced and successful the vaccination is at the particular time; and,
  • any other related circumstances.

Due to the individual nature of reasonableness, there is currently no (and will likely not be) a single correct approach with respect to whether an employer should direct employees to get the vaccination. Accordingly, employers should reasonably expect some push-back if they issue the direction. Reasons for objection may include but are not limited to, for example, human rights, political or religious implications; or a genuine medical or health reason raised under the advice of a medical practitioner.

Enforcement of a direction to be vaccinated will also be based on an assessment of the reasonableness of the direction in the circumstances, considering the personal circumstances of the employee and whether a safe working environment can be provided to the employee without the vaccination.

As an alternative approach to the vaccination, employers should not forget that they have the option of recommending or encouraging the COVID-19 vaccination to employees. By doing so, the employer indicates to employees that they support their staff getting the vaccination, but it is unenforceable, and employees may exercise their discretion to either get the vaccination or not to get it.

Given that the COVID-19 vaccination and its workplace implications are such unfamiliar grounds for all involved, it is extremely likely that the approach presently favoured will evolve further with the body of knowledge supporting the leading vaccinations. Readers should watch this space for more information.

If you require assistance with any of the above, please don’t hesitate to contact a member of Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team, who would be more than happy to assist you today.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the content at the time of publication, information, regulations, services, and best practices may change over time. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Juris what? What is accrued and cross-vested jurisdiction?

In family law matters, disputes sometimes involve issues that fall under both family law and other areas of law. The court may use either accrued jurisdiction or cross-vested jurisdiction to avoid separate court proceedings.

Forfeited…or not? When leases can be brought back to life

This article outlines the key principles and practical considerations relevant to relief against forfeiture. Forfeiture is when a tenant breaches a lease, a landlord may be entitled to terminate the lease and recover possession of the property.

Fair Work Commission increases minimum wage rates by 4.75%

The Fair Work Commission has confirmed a 4.75% increase to the national minimum wage and modern award rates from 1 July 2026, along with structural changes affecting entry-level classifications. This article outlines the key changes and practical considerations for employers.

modern slavery statement
Does your business need to give a modern slavery statement?

Modern slavery can taint the supply chain of any Australian business. To mitigate this risk the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) requires certain entities and encourages others to give annual modern slavery statements to the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department.