How the Family Law Act will approach disputes in relation to animals after June 2025 amendments.
For many, our animals have a special space in our hearts. They’re not viewed as an asset to be included in a “pick a pile” process when dividing furniture and whitegoods following separation. So, it shouldn’t be a surprise that it’s common for a Judge to be asked to decide who keeps a beloved pet.
Changes to the Family Law Act will commence on 11 June 2025. Whilst still considered to be “property,” our beloved pets will have a specific category called “companion animals.” The Act will provide considerations which may apply when the Court determines what order, if any, should be made regarding the ownership of the companion animal as part of property division.
What is a companion animal?
A ‘companion animal’ is an animal kept by the parties to a marriage/relationship or either of them, primarily for companionship. It will not be limited in species.
‘Companionship’ is not defined in the Family Law Act and is to be given its ordinary meaning.
Some classes of animals will be excluded from the definition of “companion animals”. These include:
- Assistance animals who provide support to a person with a disability.
- Animals that are kept as part of a business (such as a horse for animal breeding), for agricultural purposes (such as sheep dogs, cows) and/or kept for laboratory tests or experiments (including mice).
Whether an animal is an assistance animal or an animal kept as part of a business, agriculture or laboratory testing will be a question of fact for the Courts to determine. Animals that have a high economic value and are not used for companionship would be dealt with by the Courts in the same way as any other type of property in the property pool.
Considerations to be taken into account
The considerations the Court will have regard to in relation to who keeps a companion animal don’t differ if the parties were married or in a de-facto relationship. If asked to, the Court will decide who keeps a companion animal. Orders won’t be made for the parties to share a companion animal.
Factors the Court will consider include:
- the circumstances in which the companion animal was acquired
- who has ownership or possession of the companion animal
- the extent to which each party cared for, and paid for the maintenance of, the companion animal
- any family violence to which one party has subjected or exposed the other party
- any history of actual or threatened cruelty or abuse by a party towards the companion animal
- any attachment by a party, or a child of the marriage, to the companion animal
- the demonstrated ability of each party to care for and maintain the animal in the future, without support or involvement from the other party; and
- any other fact or circumstance which, in the court’s opinion, the justice of the case requires to be considered.
A new subsection, section 79(6) will outline orders the Courts may make in respect of ownership of a companion animal.
The National Principles to Address Coercive Control in Family and Domestic Violence 2023 explicitly recognise animal abuse as a form of family violence. Accordingly, considerations such as whether there has been any family violence to which one party has subjected or exposed the other party, and whether there has been any history of actual or threatened cruelty or abuse towards the companion animal, must be considered by the Courts when making orders about a companion animal.
They recognise that family violence is relevant to making decisions about ownership of the family pet following a relationship breakdown.
If you need assistance for putting in place agreements or orders in relation to your children and/or property after your relationship breakdown, please contact Coleman Greig’s Family Law team.
If you’re in immediate fear for your safety or the safety of a loved one, please contact the Police on 000.
