Workers warehouse

Promoting Workplace Compliance in Your Franchise Network

Whilst franchisors are indeed required to have a certain level of oversight with regard to the professional conduct of their franchisees, many franchisors may feel that it is unlikely that they will be held liable for actions taken by their franchisees.  

Contrary to this belief, Section 558B of the Fair Work Act (‘The Act’) states that a franchisor can be held liable for any breach of The Act made by a franchisee, unless they are able to prove, among other things, that they had previously taken reasonable steps to prevent the breach.

Examples of a breach of The Act may include: 

What are considered reasonable steps? 

What is actually considered reasonable within this context depends on the following factors:

  • The overall size of the franchise and its access to resources.  The larger the franchise, and the more resources available within its network, the more it is expected to do; 
  • The ability of the franchisor to influence or control what the franchisee got wrong.  This is not just with regard to operational control, it also relates to any financial and/or managemental influence the franchisor might have over its network;
  • Whether the franchise had procedures in place to allow for the effective handling of complaints relating to issues such as underpayments or other workplace law breaches; 
  • What steps the franchise took to encourage, support and train franchisees with regard to their compliance with workplace laws; and
  • What arrangements the franchisee had in place to monitor and access the franchisee’s compliance with wage, payment and record keeping obligations

Helpfully, the Fair Work Ombudsman has recently released its ‘Guide to promoting workplace compliance in your franchise network’, which I would urge any franchisors to read through carefully.  The guide is a useful tool, and sets out practical strategies that franchisors can implement in promoting compliance within their franchise network  

If a circumstance does arise wherein a franchisee is found to have been in breach of workplace laws, following this guide correctly will help franchisors satisfy the FWO that they have in fact taken reasonable steps to prevent the breach from occurring.

If you have a query regarding any of the information in this article, or for more information on workplace law compliance strategies, whether as part of a franchise set up or not, please feel free to get in contact with Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the content at the time of publication, information, regulations, services, and best practices may change over time. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Privacy Reform in Australia: What Businesses Need to Know in 2026-2027 (Part 2)

The next tranche of proposed Privacy Act reforms has arrived, with potential implications for businesses undertaking digital marketing, AI initiatives, customer analytics and other data-driven activities. We examine the key proposed changes and the practical steps organisations should consider if the reforms proceed.

Male Judge Writing On Paper
Parramatta Family Court: What to Expect

Attending Parramatta Family Court? Here’s what to expect, from getting there to what happens on the day, plus where to get support. Read our full guide.

Couple Having An Argument In Front Of Judge
Exclusive Occupation of the Family Home After Separation

After separation, disputes about who stays in the family home can quickly become stressful and complex. This article explains when the Family Court may make an exclusive occupation order and the factors considered when deciding who can remain in the property.

Juris what? What is accrued and cross-vested jurisdiction?

In family law matters, disputes sometimes involve issues that fall under both family law and other areas of law. The court may use either accrued jurisdiction or cross-vested jurisdiction to avoid separate court proceedings.