Businessman with resign letter for quit a job, Selected focus.

My employee resigned and now says that they were forced to do so! “Constructive dismissal” explained

Victoria Quayle ||

As an employer, have you ever been faced with a situation where an employee has resigned from their position, but has then made the claim that they had essentially been forced into the decision?

In a legal context, this concept is referred to as “constructive dismissal”.  Constructive dismissal is established when an employee is able to prove:

  1. that their resignation was forced; or
  2. that they had no choice but to resign due to the unacceptable or unlawful behaviour of their employer.

Forced resignation 

Forced resignation occurs when an employer has threatened to terminate the employment of an employee if they refuse to resign, and where the employee does subsequently opt to resign.
Under these circumstances, even though the employee has chosen to resign, they can reasonably argue that the decision was not voluntary, due to the fact that their employer had given them the ultimatum with the specific intent of bringing the employment relationship to an end.

In this situation it would in turn be argued that had the employer not given the ultimatum, the employee would not have resigned.

It matters not that the employer may have been motivated to offer the employee the option of resigning in order to spare the employee from embarrassment and/or safe guard their employment history from the black mark of a termination.

Similarly, employees must understand that a resignation will not be viewed as forced if an employee opts to resign before they are terminated, that is, they opt to “jump before they are pushed”.

By way of example, if an employee chooses to resign in order to avoid receiving performance management, and does so by opting to resign prior to the performance management taking place (or at a point prior to the conclusion of the process), the termination will not be viewed as forced.

Requiring an employee to participate in performance management under genuine circumstances is a legitimate action for management to take, and therefore does not support an argument that such action (that is, requiring an employee to participate in a performance management process) forced them to resign.

No choice but to resign

This occurs when an employee decides to resign, but has the ability to argue that they, realistically, had no choice, as the decision was in response to the unacceptable behaviour of their employer.

Examples of unacceptable behaviour may include (but is not limited to):

  • Making changes to employment terms and conditions – reducing a person’s pay/salary;
  • Demoting the employee;
  • Changing the employee’s working hours;
  • Relocating the employee to another work site; and
  • Ignoring, failing to take action to stop, or failing to prevent the unlawful treatment of an employee (e.g. the employee being subjected to harassment or bullying).

It is important to keep in mind that it is does not matter whether an employer did not intend, or did not foresee that the relevant employee would resign due to the employer’s unacceptable behaviour.

What if an employee can prove they have been constructively dismissed?

As an employer, you will be exposed to the same risks that you would ordinarily be exposed to had you directly terminated the person’s employment, including (but not limited to) the possibility of the employee being able to make an unfair dismissal claim or general protections/adverse action claim.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this article and would like to speak with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s employment law team with regard to constructive dismissal, please don’t hesitate to get in touch:

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

With or without you – Undefended hearings in family law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

A pipe pours brown liquid into a waterway.
Water pollution: The crime that’s hard to avoid

The offence of water pollution in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) is so broad that almost anyone could be issued a $30,000 on-the-spot fine for breaching it.

A person holds an envelope outlining termination entitlements
When do I need to pay termination entitlements?

While many modern awards state that termination entitlements are payable within 7 days of termination, recent case law has stressed that statutory entitlements must be paid on the day of termination.

How to get approval to renovate your apartment

Renovating your apartment can improve your quality of life and increase the value of your property. Conducting renovations without approval, however, can lead to significant unnecessary costs and stress.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230