Businesswoman working in office

Costs in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT)

Laura Bazouni ||

Often at the conclusion of legal proceedings, a Court or Tribunal usually determines the question of who is entitled to their “costs”. Costs refer to the legal expenses incurred by each party to a proceeding and includes disbursements such as such as filing and expert fees. 

The general common law position is that the unsuccessful party is ordered to pay part of the costs of the successful party.

The starting position in the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) is different.

Section 60(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) (the Act), states that each party to a proceeding, is to pay their own costs, regardless of the outcome as a general rule. However, there are circumstances where this position can be changed.

Special Circumstances 

NCAT has the discretion to consider the existence of any special circumstances which may warrant making an order for costs in favour of a party.

In determining whether there are special circumstances, NCAT may have regard to the following:

  • whether a party has conducted the proceedings in a way that unnecessarily disadvantaged another party to the proceeding;
  • whether a party has been responsible for unreasonably prolonging the time taken to ?nalise a proceeding;
  • the relative strengths of the claims made by each of the parties, including whether the claim had a tenable basis in fact or law;
  • the nature and complexity of proceedings;
  • whether the proceedings were frivolous or vexatious;
  • whether a party has refused or failed to comply with the duty imposed by section 36(3); and,
  • any other matter that the tribunal considers relevant. 

Consumer and Commercial Division

Notwithstanding section 60 of the Act, the position is again di?erent if you are in NCAT’s Consumer and Commercial Division. Pursuant to rule 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), costs may be awarded in the consumer and commercial division, in the absence of any special circumstances.

An order for costs may be made in circumstances where the amount claimed or in dispute in the proceedings is more than $30,000.

Ultimately, if you are a party to a proceeding in NCAT, you will generally be expected to pay your own costs, however there may be scope to seek an order for costs subject to the above.

If you have any questions in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to reach out to Coleman Greig’s Building and Construction Lawyers, who are highly experienced with matters in the NCAT’s Consumer and Commercial Division, and are able to provide expert, tailored advice – no matter the complexity of the matter.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230