The High Court’s decision in Zip v Firstmac provides important guidance on the limits of the honest concurrent use defence in trade mark disputes. This article explains the key findings and practical implications for businesses developing or using brands in competitive markets.
A recent High Court decision clarifies the distinction between trade mark infringement and misleading or deceptive conduct under Australian Consumer Law.
In December 2023, the Federal Court ordered Airbnb Ireland UC (Airbnb) to pay penalties of $15 million for admitting to false or misleading representations to Australian consumers about accommodation prices. Additionally, Airbnb has undertaken to pay up to $15 million in compensation to affected consumers.
The consumer watchdog has commenced legal action against eHarmony for alleged misleading and deceptive conduct.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to government restrictions on public gatherings. These restrictions have impacted many events and as a result both businesses and consumers
It is important that all businesses remember their obligations when promoting or advertising goods and services during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Read on to find
In late 2017, the Federal Court of Australia heard the case of Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Foods Pty Ltd – a matter which has highlighted a number of issues relating to intellectual property infringement and passing-off, which owners of private label brands can potentially face in the marketplace.
© 2026 Coleman Greig Lawyers | Sitemap | Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230
