Businesswoman hands using laptop with icon social media and social network.

Responding to Social Media Reviews

Social Media has played a large role in effectively making (almost) everything digitally accessible for the majority of the world’s population.  Decisions surrounding everyday purchases such as where to go for that date-night dinner, or where to pick up a new pair of shoes are now often made following an online review of the ever-growing list of local businesses found on social media.  

These reviews, which can be found on the official social media pages and/or via public comments which have tagged the official social media handles of businesses can go a long way in shaping both public opinion and influencing consumer choices.

Instant reviews – pros and cons

Whilst the ability to post reviews on social media has given consumers the power to provide instant feedback, which can then be responded to by businesses in real time, it has also given rise to ‘trolling’.  Trolling refers to unsolicited and, usually, unnecessary negative comments made about something online – more often than not, aimed at having the recipient (whether it be a business, celebrity or citizen) lash out in response to the ‘troll’.

Organisations often receive public complaints relating to customer service, product faults, or even seemingly small and relatively insignificant matters.  As a result of this type of online attack, an organisation’s entire image can take a beating (even unrelated aspects of their services, or areas of the organisation), something that we have seen time and time again.

Dealing with user reviews on social media

A recent example from the Northern Territory involved a customer posting a negative review to the Howard Springs Bakery Facebook page after being disappointed with the quality of their products.  The author made his displeasure known through social media, with his review being visible to not only those potential customers with Facebook accounts, but anyone with an internet connection.

From any perspective, this review appears quite reasonable and fair.  Unfortunately, the response was half-baked.

While we could potentially forgive the errors in spelling and grammar, the vulgar and threatening language used in the response was extremely aggressive and inappropriate.  Many people criticised the stand taken by the eatery for posting such a rude response to a customer’s feedback.  This may translate to a loss of business for the eatery from potential customers in opposition of both the tirade and the language used who will ‘vote with their feet’, as seen below:

However, it seems some people actually wanted a piece of the pie and applauded the stance taken by the Bakery, as seen in the following post:

Over a week later, this incident is still being discussed on the Bakery’s Facebook page.  Both the review and the response have been liked, shared and reposted by many users.  Again, this incident has highlighted the fact that a simple post on social media has no bounds and that once posted, it is usually difficult to stop ongoing circulation of the post.

It is possible to remove comments and posts from a Facebook page, although you cannot prevent users from circulating screen shots and commenting on images of the deleted posts.  Similarly, whilst a business is able to remove the overall review function from their Facebook page, it is not possible to delete a single review.  This means that if a business does want to remove a single negative review, they are required to remove all of their positive reviews at the same time, which may force them to re-think the move.

How (not) to respond to reviews on social media

While online accessibility is a key feature of social media, incidents like these do highlight the importance of businesses having a strict social media policy in place.  While you could sympathise with a business for having to deal with online reviews (rather than private discussions), online reviews are now a reality of the social media age, and your business needs to be prepared to deal with them in an appropriate manner.

Angry and aggressive responses to user reviews on social media are unlikely to resolve issues, rather they can often aggravate them.

Having a strict social media policy helps businesses take those essential steps towards damage control if negative reviews or comments are posted online.  In turn, a continued professional approach to dealing with customer feedback will help cultivate a positive image for the business in question.  This may include making decisions relating to who in the organisation will respond to the feedback, the tone (or ‘voice’) of the response, and of course how the issue mentioned in the review can most effectively be resolved.

Our team at Coleman Greig Lawyers can assist with any legalities or general confusion surrounding your business’ social media policy.  If you would like to speak with one of the lawyers in Coleman Greig’s Brand Protection team, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us on 02 9895 9230, or via info@colemangreig.com.au.

If you would like to receive our regular legal updates, please subscribe here.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230