Copyright concept with businesswoman using a tablet

Directors found personally liable for trade mark infringement

Malcolm Campbell ||

Hashtag Burgers Pty Ltd recently lost its appeal against In-N-Out Burgers, Inc in the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia and the decision has particular importance for the assessment of the personal liability of directors.

The Full Court held the directors of Hashtag Burgers liable as joint tortfeasors for the company’s wrongdoings after its incorporation. A tortfeasor is an individual or entity that has been found to have committed a civil offense that injures another party. Such disputes are resolved in the branch of the justice system that is known as tort law.

To minimise risk of this kind, directors should:

  • before using a mark, understand the difference between being inspired by, or appropriating, another mark;
  • be aware of competitors’ marks and avoid appropriating a third party’s mark thereby capitalising on (spring boarding from) a competitor’s identifiable reputation; and,
  • consider whether the director’s conduct as an individual goes beyond performing their role as director.

The Full Court held that the directors’ conduct went beyond the threshold of performing their roles as directors based on a combination of the following factors:

  • they were the sole directors of Hashtag Burgers;
  • they alone made decisions as to its management;
  • they alone received the profits derived from it;
  • there was no significant difference between how the two individuals operated the business before incorporation on 23 June 2017 and how they operated it through the corporate vehicle after it was formed; and,
  • they were knowingly involved in the company’s wrongdoing.

Accordingly, the primary judge’s findings on infringement, misleading or deceptive conduct and passing off were upheld with the Full Court identifying:

  • the primary judge erred in finding the directors to be dishonest, as there was no actual evidence of dishonesty, such a finding ‘is not a necessary part of the assessment; and…her Honour separately found the requisite intention to cause confusion on the part of [the directors]’; and,
  • in addition to a finding of personal liability before incorporation of Hashtag Burgers, the company’s directors were also liable as joint tortfeasors with Hashtag Burgers for trade mark infringement and passing off after the company’s incorporation date.

If you have any questions about any of the information in the above blog, please do not hesitate to contact a highly skilled member of Coleman Greig’s Intellectual Property Team, who would be more than happy to assist you.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Key changes to Paid Parental Leave under Baby Priya’s Law

Last month, the Australian Government passed landmark legislation called the Fair Work Amendment (Baby Priya’s) Act 2025, providing additional protections for employees who receive employer-funded paid parental leave.

A father and daughter look at a tablet together
Changing a child’s name after separation

Separation can bring with it a range of emotions and the dispute between separating parents can be far and wide, including whether the surname of a child should be retained or changed.

Photo of a woman handing a child a bag
When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230