Property-Cooling-Off

Conveyancing and Real Property Amendment Bill 2025 – Addressing the uncertainty around put options in NSW

Chris Tohme ||

The Conveyancing and Real Property Amendment Bill 2025 (the Bill) became law on 15 August 2025.

The Bill amends the Conveyancing Act 1919 (Act) and Real Property Act 1900 by clarifying the application of cooling off rights and disclosure obligations relating to put option agreements. It puts an end to four years of legal and commercial uncertainty raised by the decision in BP7 Pty Ltd v Gavancrop [2021].

Exposing a Legislative Gap – BP7 Pty Ltd v Gavancorp [2021]

A group of landowners entered into put-and-call option agreements with BP7 Pty Ltd (the developer) for 14 residential strata lots in Cronulla, NSW.

The landowners exercised their put options, triggering the sale contracts, meaning the developer was required to purchase the property. However, the developer sought to rescind the contracts within the five business day cooling off period under section 66U of the Act. This was despite the fact that under section 66T(d), there is no cooling off period in relation to a contract for the sale of residential property if the contract is made due to the exercise of an option. This raised the question of whether a put option is an “option” within the meaning of section 66T(d)t.

At the time of the decision, the definition of “option” under the Act only included an “option to purchase residential property.” The Supreme Court of NSW interpreted the expression “option to purchase” to have its ordinary and natural meaning. That is, that purchasers must have a choice to enter into the contract. Therefore, as purchasers under a put option agreement lack this element of choice (as a purchaser is effectively compelled to purchase), the put option didn’t fall under the definition. As such, the developer was entitled to the cooling off period and could rescind the contracts.

The decision went against the generally accepted practice in conveyancing at the time. Namely that purchasers had no cooling off rights under contracts resulting from the exercise of options. It meant purchasers in similar arrangements potentially had the right to rescind contracts pursuant to the exercise of a put option. As such, it created unexpected exposure and concern for vendors and developers who relied on the certainty of exercising those options.

The key amendment

To resolve uncertainty raised by Gavancorp, the Bill has introduced a new definition of “option” included in section 66P(1) of the Act. This includes both options to purchase (call options) and operations to compel purchase (put options).  The amendment has resulted in changes to the prescribed form of cooling off notice set out in Schedule 5 to the Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Regulation 2022 for all contracts of sale for residential property (and not just option agreements).

The amendment also provides further legislative clarity by ensuring consistency regarding the required documents available to purchasers before entering into put or call options.

Other amendments

Other key amendments include:

  • Confirmation, under Division 9 of Part 4 of the Act, that cooling off rights, along with the terms, conditions and warranties under the Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Regulation 2022 apply to options as defined in section 66P(1) of the Act.
  • An increase to the number of positive covenants and restrictions that, lodged with a plan, can be released through an instrument under section 88B of the Act, including:
    • Positive covenant for maintenance or repair created under section 88BA;
    • A restriction on the use of land imposed by a prescribed authority under section 88B or section 88E; and,
    • A public positive covenant.
What does this mean for you?

Whilst this Bill is now in effect, transitional provisions apply – a contract or option can include either the old or new form of cooling off notice until 31 May 2026. Contracts exchanged on and from 1 June 2026 onwards must include the required cooling off notice as amended by the Bill.

To find out how this new reform may impact your current or future property law arrangements, please contact our Property Law team.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230