healthy finess young woman runner running on beautiful road

ACCC takes Lorna Jane to court

Malcolm Campbell ||

On 21 December 2020, the ACCC commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Lorna Jane over its “Anti-virus Activewear’ claims.

Lorna Jane made claims in July 2020, via its website, Instagram accounts, Facebook, in-store advertising and garment tags that the substance sprayed on its activewear called ‘LJ Shield’, eliminated and stopped the spread of COVID-19 and provided protection against viruses and pathogens, when this was not the case.   

The ACCC noted that most of the claims were removed in July, but until at least November 2020, Lorna Jane continued to represent on garment tags that the garment permanently protected the wearers against pathogens.

The ACCC alleges that Lorna Jane engaged in conduct that was:

  • misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive in contravention of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) (contained in Schedule 1 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth));
  • made false or misleading representations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had a standard or quality which it did not have in contravention of section 29 (1)(a) of the ACL;
  • made false or misleading presentations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had performance characteristics, uses and/or benefits which it did not have in contravention of section 29(1(g) of the ACL and engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public as to the nature, characteristics and/or suitability for the purpose of ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ in contravention of section 33 of the ACL. 

The ACCC is also alleging that Ms Lorna Jane Clarkson, the CEO of Lorna Jane was a party to or knowingly concerned in these contraventions.

The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, injunctions, correction notices and an order to implement a compliance program. 

The ACCC’s actions come off the back of the Therapeutic Goods Administration issuing an infringement notice of $39,360 against Lorna Jane back in July for similar claims.  

Whilst the matter is not yet finalised, it is a timely reminder that the ACCC has prioritised consumer and competition issues arising from the pandemic and the need for care to be taken when promoting and advertising products.  

We will continue to monitor and update you on the outcome of these proceedings.

If you have any questions or concerns relating to  any of the information in this blog or you require assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s Commercial Advice team, who would be more than happy to assist you

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the content at the time of publication, information, regulations, services, and best practices may change over time. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Privacy Reform in Australia: What Businesses Need to Know in 2026-2027 (Part 2)

The next tranche of proposed Privacy Act reforms has arrived, with potential implications for businesses undertaking digital marketing, AI initiatives, customer analytics and other data-driven activities. We examine the key proposed changes and the practical steps organisations should consider if the reforms proceed.

Male Judge Writing On Paper
Parramatta Family Court: What to Expect

Attending Parramatta Family Court? Here’s what to expect, from getting there to what happens on the day, plus where to get support. Read our full guide.

Couple Having An Argument In Front Of Judge
Exclusive Occupation of the Family Home After Separation

After separation, disputes about who stays in the family home can quickly become stressful and complex. This article explains when the Family Court may make an exclusive occupation order and the factors considered when deciding who can remain in the property.

Juris what? What is accrued and cross-vested jurisdiction?

In family law matters, disputes sometimes involve issues that fall under both family law and other areas of law. The court may use either accrued jurisdiction or cross-vested jurisdiction to avoid separate court proceedings.