Female doctor makes vaccination to woman. They are wearing a protective face masks.

Can employers mandate the COVID-19 vaccine?

Victoria Quayle ||

It is no secret by now that a vaccination against COVID-19 has been in the works globally for a while. In Australia, Health Minister Greg Hunt has indicated that we can expect to see the vaccine by March 2021. This means that it is time for employers to start thinking about what implications this might have for their workplace, namely, can or should an employer require its employees to get the vaccine?

Currently, employers can make directions for employees to have specific vaccinations against common illnesses when they are working in high-risk environments, such as health or aged care. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers more broadly have been faced with unfamiliar risks and circumstances that have challenged the standards and rationale applicable to health-related directions in the workplace.

Fundamentally, employers will be able to issue a direction for employees to be vaccinated.

However, employers will have to apply the ‘lawful and reasonable’ standard to all directions made in this respect. That is, employers will have to ask themselves whether the vaccination is necessary to eliminate or minimise a realistic risk of COVID-19 infection in the workplace, to the extent reasonably practicable and consistent with the employer’s existing legal obligations.

The question of reasonableness in this context must be asked on a case-by-case basis, considering a variety of factors, including:

  • the nature of work being performed by particular employees;
  • the nature of the clients and other stakeholders;
  • whether employees can work remotely;
  • the advice and requirements of government and medical bodies at the time;
  • how advanced and successful the vaccination is at the particular time; and,
  • any other related circumstances.

Due to the individual nature of reasonableness, there is currently no (and will likely not be) a single correct approach with respect to whether an employer should direct employees to get the vaccination. Accordingly, employers should reasonably expect some push-back if they issue the direction. Reasons for objection may include but are not limited to, for example, human rights, political or religious implications; or a genuine medical or health reason raised under the advice of a medical practitioner.

Enforcement of a direction to be vaccinated will also be based on an assessment of the reasonableness of the direction in the circumstances, considering the personal circumstances of the employee and whether a safe working environment can be provided to the employee without the vaccination.

As an alternative approach to the vaccination, employers should not forget that they have the option of recommending or encouraging the COVID-19 vaccination to employees. By doing so, the employer indicates to employees that they support their staff getting the vaccination, but it is unenforceable, and employees may exercise their discretion to either get the vaccination or not to get it.

Given that the COVID-19 vaccination and its workplace implications are such unfamiliar grounds for all involved, it is extremely likely that the approach presently favoured will evolve further with the body of knowledge supporting the leading vaccinations. Readers should watch this space for more information.

If you require assistance with any of the above, please don’t hesitate to contact a member of Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team, who would be more than happy to assist you today.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

Passenger movement and visa data-matching by the ATO

Heading overseas for work or a holiday? Taxation issues, including tax residency, should be on front of mind when departing from or arriving to Australia. Why? Because the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can follow your footprints and, if you’re not careful, spring unexpected taxes on you.

Is it really necessary for my executor to have so many powers?

People often question why the executor of their estate needs to have so many powers. Simply put – if your executor isn’t given any additional powers by your Will, then they are limited to what is set out in the Trustee Act. One area that this can lead to issues in, is the family home – particularly if beneficiaries aren’t in agreement.

Essential terms of a commercial lease

A commercial lease is a contract that details the rights and obligations of a tenant and landlord. So, what are the necessary terms of a commercial lease?

Responding to data breaches

In the final part of our four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches, Special Counsel John Bennett how businesses should respond to data breaches, including application and requirements of the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme.

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230