Industrial-Manslaughter

New laws proposed for industrial manslaughter offences in NSW

Julianne Taverner, ||
Here’s what workplaces need to know

The NSW Government announced on 18 October 2023 that it is intending to introduce new laws for industrial manslaughter offences in workplaces.

What has prompted the new laws?

The proposed new laws have been prompted by a dramatic increase in the number of employees who have died while at work. In the last five years to 2022, 263 employees in NSW have died at work, a higher number than any other state in Australia.

The current state of play

Currently, employers who expose an employee to the risk of death through “gross negligence” may face imprisonment of up to five years in jail.

Unlike other states in Australia, NSW does not treat deaths of employees at work as manslaughter. This means that the penalties for a worker’s death at work in NSW are substantially lower than in other jurisdictions. In Victoria, an individual found guilty of workplace manslaughter faces fines of up to $16.5 million and up to 20 years in jail. In Queensland, individuals also face up to 20 years imprisonment.

What impact will the new laws have?

NSW is the last mainland state without an industrial manslaughter offence or legislation in parliament. The proposed laws are likely to bring NSW in line with Victoria and Queensland. They are designed to send a clear message to employers who place an employee’s life at risk of death, significantly increasing punishments for negligent employers.

In February 2023 the former NSW Government, along with other states and territories, agreed to amend model WHS laws to allow for jurisdictions to introduce industrial manslaughter.

The proposed increased penalties for employers mean that employers should continue to take a proactive approach to meeting WHS duties. They should continue to identify hazards and take steps to assess and control risks in the workplace including for visitors and contractors. Employers should also encourage a proactive safety culture.

The following recent cases and penalties show the importance of employers failing to undertake a proper risk assessment for employees:

SafeWork NSW v A1 Arbor Tree Services Pty Ltd and Anor [2023] NSWDC 256.

In this case, a 40-year-old worker was fatally injured when he was drawn into a woodchipper whilst handfeeding branches into it. The court found that A1 Arbor didn’t complete a risk assessment of the equipment. The equipment had several defects and there was little supervision of workers. Further, workers did not receive training to operate the equipment. Arbor Tree Service Pty Ltd was charged with a breach of the category 1 offence of the Work Health and Safety Act. On 14 July 2023, the defendant was convicted by the District Court and fined $2,025,000. The multimillion dollar penalty is the single largest court imposed fine for a business in NSW.

SafeWork NSW v Synergy Scaffolding Services Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 584.

In this case, a worker was fatally injured. Another worker sustained serious injury when a large section of scaffold collapsed on top of them at a construction project in Macquarie Park. Synergy Scaffolding Services Pty Ltd was charged with a breach of the category 1 offence of the Work Health and Safety Act. On 25 November 2022, the defendant was convicted by the District Court and fined $2,000,000.

What are the next steps?

The NSW Government has stated that it will begin consulting with employers and industry on the new laws and hopes to introduce new legislation in the first half of 2024. Meanwhile, SafeWork NSW will be engaging in an extensive consultation process, engaging WHS experts, business groups, unions, legal stakeholders and families whose family members have died while at work.

For more information in the impact of these proposed laws on your workplace, please contact Coleman Greig’s Employment & WHS team.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

The NSW Building Commission’s extraordinary powers

In late 2023, the NSW Government passed the Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 (Amendment Bill). The Amendment Bill established the NSW Building Commission and granted it extraordinary powers to enter construction sites, inspect work and take away information and materials.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers   |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230