intentional-wage-underpayments

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Victoria Quayle ||
Co-authored by Dylan Anderson

From 1 January 2025 employers will be held criminally liable for intentional underpayment of wages. The offence only applies to intentional underpayment that occurs after the provisions take effect.

Elements of the offence

To establish an offence, it must be shown that an employer was:

  1. Required to pay an amount to, on behalf of, or for the benefit of an employee (including wages, leave entitlements or superannuation); and
  2. The employer has intentionally done something that intentionally results in those amounts not being paid on or before the day they are due.

The intention of the employer must be assessed to determine whether it meets the requisite criteria under section 5.2 of the small business need not comply with every factor in the Code, but the FWO will look holistically at the circumstances to determine whether they comply with the Code. Where this is found, the FWO cannot bring charges against the small business.

Civil penalties for contraventions increased

As of 1 January 2025, there will also be an increase in the maximum penalty payable for civil contraventions of Australian workplace laws. The maximum penalty for companies with 15 or more employees will now be as follows:

  • The greater of $495,000 or three times the underpayment amount per contravention; or
  • The greater of $4,950,000 or three times the underpayment amount for serious contraventions.

Contact Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team for assistance in reviewing your employment contracts and enterprise agreements.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Festive season: Managing public holiday work obligations

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230