intentional-wage-underpayments

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Victoria Quayle ||

Co-authored by Dylan Anderson

As of 1 January 2025 employers will be held criminally liable for intentional underpayment of wages. The offence only applies to intentional underpayment that occurs after the provisions take effect.

Elements of the offence

To establish an offence, it must be shown that an employer was:
1. Required to pay an amount to, on behalf of, or for the benefit of an employee (including wages, leave entitlements or superannuation); and
2. The employer has intentionally done something that intentionally results in those amounts not being paid on or before the day they are due.
The intention of the employer must be assessed to determine whether it meets the requisite criteria under section 5.2 of the Criminal Code Act. This offence does not apply to circumstances of honest mistake, due to the lack of intent to underpay.

Penalties for the offence

The offence carries a maximum of 10 years imprisonment and/or a maximum fine of the greater between:
• Three times the amount of the underpayment; or
• For individuals $1,565,000; or
• For a body corporate $7,825,000.

Implications for small businesses

Small businesses are provided greater protection against a charge of intentional wage underpayment via the Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code (the Code). Compliance with the Code is achieved where a small business employer doesn’t intend to underpay their employee. The difference for a small business stems from the additional consideration that the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) must consider when determining the relevant intention, this includes:
• Any steps taken by the business to check they are paying their employees correctly; or
• Any steps taken after the business finds out about the underpayment such as
o  Correcting the mistake; or
o  Promptly back paying workers.

The small business need not comply with every factor in the Code, but the FWO will look holistically at the circumstances to determine whether they comply with the Code. Where this is found, the FWO cannot bring charges against the small business.

Civil penalties for contraventions increased

As of 1 January 2025, there will also be an increase in the maximum penalty payable for civil contraventions of Australian workplace laws. The maximum penalty for companies with 15 or more employees will now be as follows:
• The greater of $495,000 or three times the underpayment amount per contravention; or
• The greater of $4,950,000 or three times the underpayment amount for serious contraventions.

If you have any questions about the potential implications of these legislative changes, please contact Coleman Greig Lawyers Employment Law team.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Who gets to keep “Max?”

For many, our animals have a special space in our hearts. So, it should be no surprise that It isn’t uncommon for a Judge to be asked to decide who keeps a beloved pet following a relationship breakdown.

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Festive season: Managing public holiday work obligations

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230