KFC – Not too Chicken to own up to their problems in this PR strategy masterclass

Imagine being a bakery without bread, a coffee shop without coffee – or perhaps a chicken restaurant without chicken.  Even if the unimaginable happens to your business, it doesn’t need to end in a #disaster.  It is, sometimes, possible to turn a disaster into an opportunity through the utilisation of a well-thought-out PR strategy. 

Well, that’s exactly what happened to the UK arm of fast-food giant KFC earlier this month.  After changing chicken suppliers, KFC were left without chicken for a number of days.  Instead, franchisees were faced with the decision to either shut up shop or only offer popcorn chicken, coleslaw and gravy.  Not ideal.  

So what do you in this situation?  Do you sweep the problem under the carpet and hope no one notices (hint: this is never the answer) or do you face the music by acknowledging the blunder and move on? 

KFC chose the latter – and might I add, nailed its execution.  Taking out full page advertisements in local papers across the UK, the chicken retailer issued the following statement:

What do we think of KFC’s strategy? 

KFC’s response was brilliant.  This finger-licking good PR strategy contains all the necessary ingredients for a successful outcome.  KFC’s combination of humour (by playing on the acronym of KFC), with the frankness of the circumstance, is a great way to own up to an unfortunate situation.

The Twittersphere shared the love, and also enjoyed the strategy employed by KFC with some users saying: 

Schofe Tweets, AndrewBloch Tweets, yachtsforsalebl Tweets

Some Twitter users were less than impressed with the fact that they had been brought into the #KFCCrisis – with one local police twitter account having to explain that KFC lacking stock had nothing to do with them: MPSTowerHam Tweets

Key takeaways from the #KFCrisis

  • Own it!  Mistakes can happen to the best of us.  Owning the situation takes the speculation element out of the scandal and allows you to control what gets said about your brand.  You should always take the opportunity to clarify the situation.  It’s important that when you do address the issue by making a public statement, that you don’t come across as either defensive or argumentative – but instead take the opportunity to apologise for any inconvenience caused to any affected customers.
  • Be brief.  Short, sharp and simple statements pack a bunch and are more effective – particularly if you are making your statement on social media.  On average, a social media user will only spend a few seconds reading a post.  
  • Stand out!  With the limited amount of time you have to make an impression on social media users, it’s important for you to devise a strategy that is likely to catch their attention.

Whether or not profanities are in your vocabulary, it is human nature to be intrigued by such language, particularly when used in print media.  KFC cleverly danced around the line, by rearranging the letters in their logo to draw readers in and to dupe them into thinking the f-bomb was dropped.  Whilst we don’t recommend dropping profanities in your next PR statement, it might be worth having a think about including some eye catching and clever material that appeals to the curiosity of your readers.

Have you ever found yourself in a similar situation to the #KFCcrisis?  Tweet us your mishap and let me know how you handled the situation @ColemanGreig!  

If you would like to receive our regular legal updates, please subscribe here.  Alternatively, if you would like to speak with one of the lawyers in Coleman Greig’s Brand Protection team, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us on 02 9895 9230, or via info@colemangreig.com.au.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

The risks with cyber attacks and data breaches

Part 1 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches. Cyber attacks and data breaches are the top business risk in Australia according to Aon’s 2023 Global Risk Management Survey.

Help! My builder won’t finish the job – what do I do?

It’s normal for building projects to experience setbacks during construction.  However, in extreme cases your builder may suspend works and leave the site or disappear without explanation. This article will explain your available options if your builder won’t return to the site, and how to avoid the common pitfalls which may affect your rights against your builder.

Is your intellectual property secure?

Securing intellectual property (IP) is critical in today’s competitive and increasingly digital landscape. From innovative startups to established enterprises, big or small, safeguarding your business’ intellectual assets can help ensure sustained competitiveness, legal protection and set you up to capitalise on your unique creations.

Out with the old (section 260) and in with the new (Part IVA)

Part IVA overcomes deficiencies of section 260 of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA), exposed by judicial decisions. Part IVA was introduced, albeit with limitations on scope, to provide an appropriate balance between combatting tax avoidance without discouraging commercial and familial transactions.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230