Hacker attack the server in the dark

Software development: I paid for it, isn’t it mine?

Caroline Hutchinson ||

Ownership of computer software and applications: the difficulties under the Copyright Act.  

If you or your business have contracted a third-party to either create or develop a piece of software for you, it may come as a surprise to know that you may not actually own that source coding – even if the work was undertaken based on your ideas, under your instruction and you paid for it!

This could be quite a scary proposition, and a wake up call for many business owners.

Under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the expression of an idea, rather than the idea itself, is afforded automatic protection (unlike other forms of intellectual property).  It therefore stands to reason that as the ‘author’ of the source code, the contractor that you engaged to write the code would be seen as the legal owner of the code – even if the inspiration for its development (and the funds put towards its production) came from you.

In the same way that if you chose to commission an oil painting of yourself (perhaps atop a unicorn dressed in your best Napoleonic costume?), the painter would hold ownership of the actual painting.  One (and perhaps for many of us, a more relatable) example comes from the movie: The Hangover Part 2.

In this particular scenario, the tattoo artist responsible for Mike Tyson’s famous face tattoo sought to restrain Warner Bros. for unauthorised copying of the tattoo, when Warner Bros. had sought to use it on a character in the movie (the matter settled outside of court).  Even though the tattoo is indeed permanently located on Mike Tyson’s face, the tattoo artist retained the rights of the image, and was subsequently able to effectively bring the suit against Warner Bros.

Even if you do look to pre-empt this issue by including a clause in the contract along the lines of “the codes, once created, belong to [you]”, it may not be enough to affect an assignment of the coding to you or your business.  It should be noted that the position is usually different if an employee (or consultant) develops the code – although generally speaking this would depend on the individual facts and circumstances, as well as the terms and wording of any employment contract or consultancy agreement.

While the legal ownership of your coding may not affect the operation of your business now, you may find that it becomes a more pressing issue in the future if you ever decide to try to commercialise the software by granting a licence, or otherwise sell your business.

Key take away

Just because you paid for it, does not necessarily mean you own it.  At law, the usual position where development of software is subcontracted out, is that you have a legal right to use the software, but that you will not own it.

If you have concerns pertaining to your ownership rights, or would simply like to have an experienced lawyer review an agreement that you have in order to ensure that your business owns what it has paid for, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with Coleman Greig’s Commercial Advice team.


Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.


More posts

SafeWork NSW
SafeWork NSW releases new strategy to address psychosocial hazards

On 22 May 2024 SafeWork NSW introduced a new strategy to address psychological and psychosocial hazards. The SafeWork NSW Psychological Health and Safety Strategy 2024-2026 establishes new supports for employers regarding their duties in preventing psychosocial harm in the workplace.

roles in the strata scheme
Understanding roles in the strata scheme

A strata scheme is a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots which can be apartments, villas, offices, units or townhouses. This will be articulated in the strata plan.

Airbnb home
Can I put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

liquidators required to seek approval
When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building
Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Dismiss an employee
Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

Phoenixing in Construction
New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230