Girl prepairing for workout

Kardashian Shapewear Draws Criticism for Cultural Insensitivity

Malcolm Campbell ||

Being no stranger to controversy, Kim Kardashian is currently facing public scrutiny regarding the release of her new body shapewear line, ‘Kimono’. Kim’s choice of brand name has prompted widespread accusations of cultural insensitivity due to its blatant disrespect of the Japanese culture. Understandably, the Kardashian fashion line of ‘solution wear’ for women is vastly different to the culturally significant Japanese traditional robe.

Unsurprisingly, Kim has faced significant backlash and widespread allegations of cultural insensitivity and appropriation for the use of her trade mark. A social media frenzy has consequently sparked with the #KimOhNo campaign trending on multiple social media platforms. Japanese women have also actively protested against the Kardashian business venture by sharing photographs of themselves in the traditional Japanese gown. The Mayor of Kyoto, Daisaku Kadokawa, has also requested that Kim reconsider her decision to use the name “Kimono” as her trade mark and to recognise the importance of the word within Japan’s cultural history. Kadokawa further explained that Japan was in the process of registering ‘Kimono’ on UNESCO’S Intangible Cultural Heritage List and consequently the word should not be monopolised or the subject of a trade mark application. Kim has since bowed to public pressure by announcing that she will consider changing the name of her shapewear brand.

Interestingly, the registration of the word ‘Kimono’ for the Kardashian shapewear line will not prevent individuals (or countries) from using the term. It is worth considering the millions of registrations for commonly understood words on Trade Mark Registers around the world that do not impede on the use of the word in a cultural way or as a descriptive term. The most commonly known example is the well-known brand ‘Apple’. Apple Inc.’s trade mark registrations for the common fruit only prevents other entities from using the word ‘apple’ in relation to the goods and services covered by its registrations, namely computers and computer software, ultimately stopping other entities from abusing or “riding on the coat tails” on the success and reputation of the Apple brand. In the current circumstances, Kim’s use of the trade mark “Kimono” allows her to use the word in relation to her shapewear line but does not preclude or restrict anyone from making kimonos or using the word kimono in reference to the traditional Japanese garment.

Since the release of the shapewear line in June, it has been revealed that Kim has filed trade mark applications not only for the word ‘Kimono’ but for the trade marks ‘Kimono Body’, ‘Kimono Intimates’ and ‘Kimono World’ in the United States. The key issue at play when considering the registration of these terms is that of cultural appropriation and the intellectual property (IP) rights of Indigenous culture and knowledge. In early 2018 IP Australia published the Indigenous Knowledge: Issues for protection and management; a paper which closely explored the relationship between tradition-based knowledge of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and issues of IP. The Report encouraged businesses to ‘do the right thing’ and respect the integrity of Indigenous knowledge to avoid potential misappropriation, particularly when considering trade marks. Recently, Sydney’s Federal Court ordered Birubi Art Pty Ltd to pay a multimillion-dollar penalty after it was found in October 2018 to have produced fake aboriginal artwork.

Key Takeaways for Businesses

Kim’s ‘Kimono’ trade mark debacle raises several important lessons for businesses. Firstly, businesses should be urged to take the necessary steps to research the availability and registrability of a trade mark. This should be done well before a trade mark is registered or promoted within the public domain. Within an Australian context, businesses should be aware of section 42 of the Trade Marks Act which makes it possible for the Registrar of Trade Marks to reject a trade mark application if the mark is considered to be ‘scandalous’. An application may also be opposed by a third party on the same grounds. Additionally, it is of upmost importance for businesses to consider the broader cultural issues when researching the legal aspects of a new brand and seeking protection for that brand. A company’s choice of words can negatively impact a brand’s reputation and create bad publicity costs, possibly to the brands demise as seen by the public backlash ‘Kimono’ has faced in the short space of a week.

For more information or to discuss a trade mark application that may be culturally insensitive, please contact our Intellectual Property team.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

SafeWork NSW
SafeWork NSW releases new strategy to address psychosocial hazards

On 22 May 2024 SafeWork NSW introduced a new strategy to address psychological and psychosocial hazards. The SafeWork NSW Psychological Health and Safety Strategy 2024-2026 establishes new supports for employers regarding their duties in preventing psychosocial harm in the workplace.

roles in the strata scheme
Understanding roles in the strata scheme

A strata scheme is a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots which can be apartments, villas, offices, units or townhouses. This will be articulated in the strata plan.

Airbnb home
Can I put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

liquidators required to seek approval
When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building
Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Dismiss an employee
Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

Phoenixing in Construction
New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230