Businessman with resign letter for quit a job, Selected focus.

My employee resigned and now says that they were forced to do so! “Constructive dismissal” explained

Victoria Quayle ||

As an employer, have you ever been faced with a situation where an employee has resigned from their position, but has then made the claim that they had essentially been forced into the decision?

In a legal context, this concept is referred to as “constructive dismissal”.  Constructive dismissal is established when an employee is able to prove:

  1. that their resignation was forced; or
  2. that they had no choice but to resign due to the unacceptable or unlawful behaviour of their employer.

Forced resignation 

Forced resignation occurs when an employer has threatened to terminate the employment of an employee if they refuse to resign, and where the employee does subsequently opt to resign.
Under these circumstances, even though the employee has chosen to resign, they can reasonably argue that the decision was not voluntary, due to the fact that their employer had given them the ultimatum with the specific intent of bringing the employment relationship to an end.

In this situation it would in turn be argued that had the employer not given the ultimatum, the employee would not have resigned.

It matters not that the employer may have been motivated to offer the employee the option of resigning in order to spare the employee from embarrassment and/or safe guard their employment history from the black mark of a termination.

Similarly, employees must understand that a resignation will not be viewed as forced if an employee opts to resign before they are terminated, that is, they opt to “jump before they are pushed”.

By way of example, if an employee chooses to resign in order to avoid receiving performance management, and does so by opting to resign prior to the performance management taking place (or at a point prior to the conclusion of the process), the termination will not be viewed as forced.

Requiring an employee to participate in performance management under genuine circumstances is a legitimate action for management to take, and therefore does not support an argument that such action (that is, requiring an employee to participate in a performance management process) forced them to resign.

No choice but to resign

This occurs when an employee decides to resign, but has the ability to argue that they, realistically, had no choice, as the decision was in response to the unacceptable behaviour of their employer.

Examples of unacceptable behaviour may include (but is not limited to):

  • Making changes to employment terms and conditions – reducing a person’s pay/salary;
  • Demoting the employee;
  • Changing the employee’s working hours;
  • Relocating the employee to another work site; and
  • Ignoring, failing to take action to stop, or failing to prevent the unlawful treatment of an employee (e.g. the employee being subjected to harassment or bullying).

It is important to keep in mind that it is does not matter whether an employer did not intend, or did not foresee that the relevant employee would resign due to the employer’s unacceptable behaviour.

What if an employee can prove they have been constructively dismissed?

As an employer, you will be exposed to the same risks that you would ordinarily be exposed to had you directly terminated the person’s employment, including (but not limited to) the possibility of the employee being able to make an unfair dismissal claim or general protections/adverse action claim.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this article and would like to speak with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s employment law team with regard to constructive dismissal, please don’t hesitate to get in touch:

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

The risks with cyber attacks and data breaches

Part 1 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches. Cyber attacks and data breaches are the top business risk in Australia according to Aon’s 2023 Global Risk Management Survey.

Help! My builder won’t finish the job – what do I do?

It’s normal for building projects to experience setbacks during construction.  However, in extreme cases your builder may suspend works and leave the site or disappear without explanation. This article will explain your available options if your builder won’t return to the site, and how to avoid the common pitfalls which may affect your rights against your builder.

Is your intellectual property secure?

Securing intellectual property (IP) is critical in today’s competitive and increasingly digital landscape. From innovative startups to established enterprises, big or small, safeguarding your business’ intellectual assets can help ensure sustained competitiveness, legal protection and set you up to capitalise on your unique creations.

Out with the old (section 260) and in with the new (Part IVA)

Part IVA overcomes deficiencies of section 260 of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA), exposed by judicial decisions. Part IVA was introduced, albeit with limitations on scope, to provide an appropriate balance between combatting tax avoidance without discouraging commercial and familial transactions.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230