Businessman with resign letter for quit a job, Selected focus.

My employee resigned and now says that they were forced to do so! “Constructive dismissal” explained

Victoria Quayle ||

As an employer, have you ever been faced with a situation where an employee has resigned from their position, but has then made the claim that they had essentially been forced into the decision?

In a legal context, this concept is referred to as “constructive dismissal”.  Constructive dismissal is established when an employee is able to prove:

  1. that their resignation was forced; or
  2. that they had no choice but to resign due to the unacceptable or unlawful behaviour of their employer.

Forced resignation 

Forced resignation occurs when an employer has threatened to terminate the employment of an employee if they refuse to resign, and where the employee does subsequently opt to resign.
Under these circumstances, even though the employee has chosen to resign, they can reasonably argue that the decision was not voluntary, due to the fact that their employer had given them the ultimatum with the specific intent of bringing the employment relationship to an end.

In this situation it would in turn be argued that had the employer not given the ultimatum, the employee would not have resigned.

It matters not that the employer may have been motivated to offer the employee the option of resigning in order to spare the employee from embarrassment and/or safe guard their employment history from the black mark of a termination.

Similarly, employees must understand that a resignation will not be viewed as forced if an employee opts to resign before they are terminated, that is, they opt to “jump before they are pushed”.

By way of example, if an employee chooses to resign in order to avoid receiving performance management, and does so by opting to resign prior to the performance management taking place (or at a point prior to the conclusion of the process), the termination will not be viewed as forced.

Requiring an employee to participate in performance management under genuine circumstances is a legitimate action for management to take, and therefore does not support an argument that such action (that is, requiring an employee to participate in a performance management process) forced them to resign.

No choice but to resign

This occurs when an employee decides to resign, but has the ability to argue that they, realistically, had no choice, as the decision was in response to the unacceptable behaviour of their employer.

Examples of unacceptable behaviour may include (but is not limited to):

  • Making changes to employment terms and conditions – reducing a person’s pay/salary;
  • Demoting the employee;
  • Changing the employee’s working hours;
  • Relocating the employee to another work site; and
  • Ignoring, failing to take action to stop, or failing to prevent the unlawful treatment of an employee (e.g. the employee being subjected to harassment or bullying).

It is important to keep in mind that it is does not matter whether an employer did not intend, or did not foresee that the relevant employee would resign due to the employer’s unacceptable behaviour.

What if an employee can prove they have been constructively dismissed?

As an employer, you will be exposed to the same risks that you would ordinarily be exposed to had you directly terminated the person’s employment, including (but not limited to) the possibility of the employee being able to make an unfair dismissal claim or general protections/adverse action claim.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this article and would like to speak with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s employment law team with regard to constructive dismissal, please don’t hesitate to get in touch:

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Elisha v Vision Australia Limited 2024

What happens where an employer ‘botches’ an investigation and dismissal process? A recent High Court case has shed some light…and provides a useful reminder about the importance of following due process.

The New Scam Prevention Framework and It’s Impact on Businesses

Many amendments to the Privacy Act stemming from changes to strengthen privacy protections for all Australians are now in force. However, the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 has attracted some criticism from businesses – particularly in relation to its statutory tort.

Who gets to keep “Max?”

For many, our animals have a special space in our hearts. So, it should be no surprise that It isn’t uncommon for a Judge to be asked to decide who keeps a beloved pet following a relationship breakdown.

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230