two hands are visible on opposite sides of a desk. One hand is writing on a notepad

Changes to the definition of ‘casual employee’

Victoria Quayle ||

On 24 July 2023, Industrial Relations Minister, The Hon Tony Burke MP, announced that the Australian Government will reform the definition of a casual employee as a part of its next set of workplace reforms.

Minister Burke revealed that 75 consultation meetings have already taken place with more to come. Groups including businesses, trade unions, academics, and civil society have been consulted.

The ‘what’s really going on’ test

According to Minister Burke we can expect that the casual definition will revert back to its prior meaning before legislative changes from a couple years ago.

This proposal by the Government may therefore also overturn the High Court’s decision in Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) and align with the Federal Court’s earlier decision in Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2020).

The current legislative definition means that an employee’s work status is determined according to their contract, regardless of whether this is inconsistent with the reality of their working situation.

However, with this proposed change, the new definition would effectively ask the question ‘what’s really going on’. It will take a more practical approach, looking at whether the employee is in fact working as a casual or is working permanent hours.

Minister Burke predicts that this reform will provide more than 850,000 casual employees who have regular work arrangements a pathway to become permanent. The emphasis has been placed on choice with no forced change of working status.

Closing the loophole

The Government has indicated that its intention is to ‘close the loophole that leaves people stuck as casuals when they actually work permanent regular hours’.

Under the Government’s proposal, the current casual conversion framework will also remain in place. This includes an allowance for employers, on reasonable grounds, to refuse an offer or request a conversion. However, there is consideration of shortening the request timeframe from 12-months. This means that regular casual employees could have the choice to convert to permanent after six-months in the job, and every six-months after that.

Risks and concerns

Given the existing ambiguity, there are some general concerns with the proposal. One key concern is that the change particularly impacts small and medium business, and could incentivise employers to reduce the hours of their casual workers.

There are further fears that this decision will prevent employees from being appropriately paid based upon their skill and experience. This is despite Minister Burke’s assurance that such change will not entitle a new employee to receive the same pay and benefits as an experienced employee.

Most notably, concerns have been expressed that the proposal will mean businesses that misclassify permanent employees as casuals will be liable for backpay for annual leave or other entitlements. However, the Government has asserted that this will be a ‘proscriptive’ change and promised that it will not result in backpay.

Ultimately, the reality is that we won’t know the precise details of these proposed changes and their impact until the draft wording of the Bill is released.

For more information or to discuss the potential impact of these changes, please contact Coleman Greig’s Employment Law team.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

Passenger movement and visa data-matching by the ATO

Heading overseas for work or a holiday? Taxation issues, including tax residency, should be on front of mind when departing from or arriving to Australia. Why? Because the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can follow your footprints and, if you’re not careful, spring unexpected taxes on you.

Is it really necessary for my executor to have so many powers?

People often question why the executor of their estate needs to have so many powers. Simply put – if your executor isn’t given any additional powers by your Will, then they are limited to what is set out in the Trustee Act. One area that this can lead to issues in, is the family home – particularly if beneficiaries aren’t in agreement.

Essential terms of a commercial lease

A commercial lease is a contract that details the rights and obligations of a tenant and landlord. So, what are the necessary terms of a commercial lease?

Responding to data breaches

In the final part of our four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches, Special Counsel John Bennett how businesses should respond to data breaches, including application and requirements of the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme.

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230