Contracts-and-Policies-WS

Big changes ahead for the regulation of building products in NSW

Ben Johnson ||

Co-authored by Jace Coaldrake-Redhouse and Chloe Ferreira

All participants in the construction industry need to be aware of imminent changes to the laws regulating building products. The changes have been inserted into the Building Products (Safety) Act 2017 (NSW) but extend far beyond product safety to the suitability of use and quality of installation of those products.

The Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 introduced Part 2A into the Safety Act. The amendments aim to create accountability in the supply chain for building products and give regulators the necessary tools to identify and intervene in the use of non-conforming building products. They are intended to begin operating in early 2025.

The amendments establish a chain of responsibility for all building products. The chain of responsibility includes anyone who designs or deals with a building product knowing that it will be used in a building. It also includes anyone who:

  • prepares a building design that incorporates or recommends the use of the product in the building, for example, building designers, engineers and architects, and
  • uses the product in a building, for example, installing, coordinating or supervising the installation of the product.

The wide-ranging scope of the new rules brings all of the following parties within the chain of responsibility:

  • Manufacturers;
  • Wholesalers;
  • Suppliers;
  • Importers;
  • Distributors;
  • Builders;
  • Subcontractors;
  • Engineers; and,
  • Architects.

The duties owed by those in the chain of responsibility are to:

  • Ensure the use of the product complies with the National Construction Code (s 8E);
  • Ensure the use of the product is suitable with its purpose (s 8E);
  • Provide information on the product (such as manufacturers guidelines) to the next person in the chain of responsibility (s 8F and s 8G);
  • Notify the Secretary of any risk of non-compliance or any safety risk (s 8H); and,
  • Recall certain products (s 8I).

The duty will expand or shrink to the extent that a person in the chain of responsibility has knowledge of, or control over, the action resulting in breach. A manufacturer who produces a quality product may not be aware of a breach that occurs during installation. However, a manufacturer that does know about a likely breach caused by another party installing its product incorrectly , may be in breach of its duty of care even though its product is of appropriate quality.

The amendments apply to everyone who deals with building products, not just the companies and businesses with control over the products. Employees are subject to these duties and could find themselves in a position where they have a duty to inform the Secretary about breaches of a duty by their employers.

The amendments also establish a regime for the seizure and forfeiture of building products. Seizure may occur where a person authorised by the Secretary, believes on reasonable grounds that:

  • A non-compliance risk exists in relation to the product;
  • A safety risk exists in relation to the intended use of the product;
  • Seizure is necessary to determine whether a risk exists; and,
  • An offence under the Building Products (Safety) Act has been committed in relation to the product.

Significant penalties apply for breaches of the Act, including:

  • Maximum penalties of $165,000 for corporations and $55,000 for individuals for breaches of the duties owed in relation to conforming products, compliant uses and the provision of information have.
  • Failing to notify the Secretary of a non-compliance or safety risk has maximum penalties of $55,000 for corporations, with an additional penalty of $22,000 for each day the offence continues. Individuals may be subject to maximum penalties of $22,000, with an additional penalty of $11,000 for each day the offence continues.
  • Failing to comply with Safety notices, which can apply to directors of a company receiving the notice, has maximum penalties of:
    • $1.1 million for a corporation, with an additional penalty of $111,000 for each day the offence continues.
    • $220,000 and/or two years imprisonment for an individual, with an additional penalty of $44,000 for each day the offence continues.
    • $22,000 for a director who fails to take all reasonable steps to stop a corporation from committing the offence.

If you deal with building products and require further advice in relation to what these changes mean for you, please contact our Building & Construction lawyers.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

Passenger movement and visa data-matching by the ATO

Heading overseas for work or a holiday? Taxation issues, including tax residency, should be on front of mind when departing from or arriving to Australia. Why? Because the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can follow your footprints and, if you’re not careful, spring unexpected taxes on you.

Is it really necessary for my executor to have so many powers?

People often question why the executor of their estate needs to have so many powers. Simply put – if your executor isn’t given any additional powers by your Will, then they are limited to what is set out in the Trustee Act. One area that this can lead to issues in, is the family home – particularly if beneficiaries aren’t in agreement.

Essential terms of a commercial lease

A commercial lease is a contract that details the rights and obligations of a tenant and landlord. So, what are the necessary terms of a commercial lease?

Responding to data breaches

In the final part of our four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches, Special Counsel John Bennett how businesses should respond to data breaches, including application and requirements of the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme.

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230