Focused businessman is reading through magnifying glass document

Parliamentary Inquiry into Franchising: What’s Wrong Within the Sector?

Over the last few months, we have witnessed an unprecedented number of franchise systems being embroiled in scandals, from the poor treatment of franchisees, systematic underpayments, visa fraud and numerous breaches of the Franchising Code of Conduct.  

In light of this, there was a call for a parliamentary inquiry into the franchising sector and the effectiveness of the Code.  This Inquiry is currently well underway, with hearings being conducted with a view to getting a report to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services by 30 September 2018.

The inquiry will look into franchising as a whole, with a focus on:

a) The operation and effectiveness of the Franchising Code (including the disclosure document and information statement) in ensuring full disclosure to potential franchisees of all information necessary in making a fully informed decision when assessing whether to enter a franchise agreement, including information on the:
i.    likely financial performance of a franchise, as well as worse-case scenarios;
ii.    contractual rights and obligations of all parties (including termination rights and geographical exclusivity);
iii.    leasing arrangements, and any limitations of the franchisee’s ability to enforce tenant’s rights; and
iv.    expected running costs, including costs of goods required to be purchased through prescribed suppliers.

b) The effectiveness of dispute resolution under the Franchising Code;

c) The impact of the Australian Consumer Law unfair contract provisions on new, renewed and terminated franchise agreements entered into since 12 November 2016, including whether changes to standard franchise agreements have come about;

d) Whether the provisions of other mandatory industry codes contain advantages or disadvantages relevant to franchising relationships in comparison with the terms of the Franchising Code;

e) The adequacy and operation of termination provisions in the Franchising Code;

f) The imposition of restraints of trade on former franchisees following the termination of a franchise agreement;

g) The enforcement of breaches of the Franchising Code and other applicable laws (such as the Competition and Consumer Act) by franchisors; and

h) Any related matters.

As with anything, there are two sides to every story, and whilst the inquiry appears to have placed a particular focus on the power imbalance between franchisors and franchisees, it appears to be extensive enough to encourage a balanced review of the sector.  This in itself is a challenge, as the public’s current perception of franchising is heavily influenced by the media, which appears to lack objectivity.

The fact that franchising is under the spotlight is not new to those of us paying attention, in fact it was only some 3 years ago that amendments to the Code were made following the Wein report into both the Code and the franchising model.  Given the breadth of the inquiry, it is indeed likely that it may result in significant amendments to the Code, as well as the regulatory framework.

What those changes may entail, no one yet knows – however it is important for franchisors to continuously review the business model and agreements, with a particular focus on being reasonable and fair.

If you would like to speak with one of our franchising lawyers regarding the parliamentary inquiry, or would simply like some advice with regard to your personal franchising situation, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with:

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

A father and daughter look at a tablet together
Changing a child’s name after separation

Separation can bring with it a range of emotions and the dispute between separating parents can be far and wide, including whether the surname of a child should be retained or changed.

Photo of a woman handing a child a bag
When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230