Businessman walking in airport

Implications of Brexit on Trade Mark Owners

Malcolm Campbell ||

On the morning of Friday 24 May 2019, on the front steps of 10 Downing Street, Theresa May announced her resignation as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.  Brexit has struck again, and has taken its next political victim.

Following a referendum held on 23 June 2016, the United Kingdom was due to exit the European Union (‘EU’) on 29 March 2019.  However, the withdrawal agreement reached between the European Union and UK has now been rejected three times by members of the UK’s Parliament, and the leaders of the European Union have granted a six-month extension until 31 October 2019.

There is speculation that the UK could still the leave the EU later in the year, with a “no-deal” Brexit.
Whilst you may not think that the effects of Brexit are likely to reach the shores of Australia some 15,000 kilometres away, or that they would have the potential for lasting impact – the reality is that a “no-deal” Brexit would impact Australian trade mark owners who have either secured a registration, or have a pending application for a trade mark in the EU (which includes protection for the mark in all 27-member states, including the UK).

Up until recently there had been significant uncertainty surrounding the fate of trade mark owners post-Brexit, although regulations are beginning to take shape, and the actions of the UK government and the UK Intellectual Property Office look to be removing some of this uncertainty.

What implications would a no-deal Brexit have on the owners of registered trade marks in the UK?

If a “no-deal” Brexit does take place, the UK will no longer be covered by EU trade marks and community registered designs.  However, the UK government has proposed to put in place the following mechanisms in order to ensure the continued protection of trade mark owner intellectual property rights within the UK:

  1. New “comparable” trade marks in the UK: For every EU trade mark that is registered post-Brexit, the UK government intends to automatically create a UK comparable trade mark.  The comparable trade mark will keep the same filing date of the EU trade mark, will maintain its EU registration number and will be easily identified by the prefix ‘UK009’.
  2. Pending EU trade marks: Those who have a pending trade mark at the time the UK leaves the EU,  will not be automatically given a “comparable UK trade mark application’.  With this said, the UK government does intend to provide such applicants with a 9-month priority period from Brexit during which they can file new UK trade mark applications.
  3. International trade marks designating the EU: The UK government has provided assurances that there will be continuity of protection within the UK for international trade marks which currently designate the EU.  Discussions between the UK and the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) regarding how to achieve this are ongoing.
  4. Pending EU oppositions and cancellation actions: Existing disputes at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) will not automatically give rise to an equivalent dispute in respect of the equivalent UK right, whether that is a UK comparable trade mark or registered design, or a new UK trade mark application or registered design application filed within the 9-month priority period granted in respect of pending EU rights.

Owners of trade marks in the EU should keep themselves up to date and closely monitor the situation.  Coleman Greig would even suggest conducting audits of existing protections, enforcements, and agreements concerning the UK, so as to be in a better position to make informed decisions when the time comes to do so.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this article, or you would like to speak with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s Commercial Advice team with regard to your own trade marks, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

Passenger movement and visa data-matching by the ATO

Heading overseas for work or a holiday? Taxation issues, including tax residency, should be on front of mind when departing from or arriving to Australia. Why? Because the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can follow your footprints and, if you’re not careful, spring unexpected taxes on you.

Is it really necessary for my executor to have so many powers?

People often question why the executor of their estate needs to have so many powers. Simply put – if your executor isn’t given any additional powers by your Will, then they are limited to what is set out in the Trustee Act. One area that this can lead to issues in, is the family home – particularly if beneficiaries aren’t in agreement.

Essential terms of a commercial lease

A commercial lease is a contract that details the rights and obligations of a tenant and landlord. So, what are the necessary terms of a commercial lease?

Responding to data breaches

In the final part of our four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches, Special Counsel John Bennett how businesses should respond to data breaches, including application and requirements of the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme.

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230