Part of urban real estate. Modern ventilated facade with windows. Diagonal arrangement.

Important changes to the foreign resident capital gains withholding tax regime

Saveen Mathews ||

The Federal Government (the Government) has announced several significant changes in its Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook report, released on 13 December 2023.

The Government has announced changes to the Foreign Resident Capital Gains Withholding regime (FRCGW). Of note, the FRCGW tax rate will be increased from 12.5% to 15% and the withholding threshold will be reduced from $750,000 to $0, for real property disposals entered into from 1 January 2025.

The current FRCGW regime

The FRCGW tax has been imposed since 1 July 2016. It is applied to foreign resident vendors who dispose of certain taxable property, including taxable real property with a value of $750,000 or more, and other assets such as indirect Australian real property interests in Australian entities. The regime is intended to ensure the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can collect the correct amount of foreign residents’ Australian tax liabilities. If there are multiple vendors in a sale, only one is required to be a foreign resident for the FRCGW regime to apply.

Currently, the regime obliges purchasers to withhold 12.5% of the purchase price of the property from the vendor, and instead remit that to the ATO.

Purchasers of real property are required to pay the FRCGW tax amount to the ATO if, at the time of the purchase, they know or reasonably believe that the vendor is a foreign resident.

However, the purchaser does not have to withhold the 12.5% from the purchaser if the vendor gives them a declaration, in writing, which declares that they are an Australian resident, and the purchaser does not know this declaration to be false.

Similarly, a declaration can be given that the CGT assets are membership interests but not indirect Australian real property interests.

CGT assets which are membership interests are indirect Australian real property interests if the sum of the membership interests held in the entity is at least 10% of that entity, and the market value of that entity’s taxable Australian real property exceeds the market value of their assets which are not taxable Australian real property.

This declaration is only valid for a period of 6 months.

For an Australian vendor selling real property, they can also avoid the 12.5% from being withheld from them by providing the purchaser with, before settlement, a clearance certificate obtained from the ATO. This clearance certificate certifies from the Commissioner that, based on the information before them, there is nothing to suggest the vendor is a foreign resident.

If an Australian vendor has failed to obtain a clearance certificate before settlement, they need to claim a credit for the amount withheld in their next income tax return.

Foreign resident vendors can apply for a variation of the withholding rate. This can be reduced all the way to nil in certain circumstances – for example if they expect to make a capital loss on the sale of the property.

Changes to the FRCGW regime

For contracts for the sale of real property entered into from 1 January 2025, the withholding rate required by purchasers from the purchase price will increase from 12.5% to 15%.

The threshold for the regime will now decrease to nil, no longer only applying to real property valued at $750,000 or more.

The Government intends for this measure to improve housing affordability for Australians, and to ensure better compliance with Australian tax obligations for foreign residents.

The measure is estimated to increase Government’s receipts by $150.5 million, and increase payments by $5.9 million over the five years from 2022-23.

An example

Victor is a foreign resident, who is selling a commercial property with a cost base of $1 million. Victor expects to make a capital loss on the sale.

Victor applies to the Commissioner for a variation. The Commissioner issues a variation notice to Victor stating that the amount payable, to the Commissioner, by a purchaser of Victor’s property is reduced to nil. The variation is subject to the condition that the purchase price for the property doesn’t exceed $1 million.

Later, Paul agrees to purchase the property from Victor for $900,000. Victor provides a copy of the variation notice to Paul. The variation takes effect and Paul’s liability to the Commissioner is reduced to nil.

If Paul wasn’t provided with a variation notice, he would be required to pay 12.5% ($125,000) of the purchase price to the ATO under the current regime. Under the new regime he would have to pay 15% ($150,000), to the ATO. These amounts are withheld from Victor as the seller.

The key takeaway

The changes announced by the Government could have significant financial consequences for foreign residents selling property in Australia. Whilst 2.5% doesn’t sound significant, with rising housing prices, even 2.5% of a $2 million property will mean vendors are losing out on a further $50,000. For a $700,000 property the effect is even worse, as vendors will now miss out on $105,000 of the sale price, compared to 0% of the sale price before.

For more information in what these changes will mean moving forward, please contact Coleman Greig’s experienced Taxation Law team.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Festive season: Managing public holiday work obligations

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230