Signing-document

Is an Inheritance Received Post Separation ‘Safe’?

Given the delays that are often experienced in both the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (and in addition to the time that it takes for a person to rearrange their affairs upon separation), parties will often receive an inheritance after they separate, although before they have entered into a property settlement with their ex-partner.

There is a common misconception that under these circumstances, an inheritance received post-separation will not be taken into account in relation to the family law matter.  The case of Holland & Holland [2017] FamCAFC 166 demonstrates that this is in fact incorrect.

In the matter of Holland & Holland, a property was, at first instance, excluded from the property pool, as it had been received post-separation.  The property was considered to be a financial resource (that is, an amount of money that a person would have access to post-separation, but not an asset of the relationship).  The inheritance received was worth $715,000.  The asset pool, not including the inheritance, was only $370,000.

The wife in this matter appealed, saying that the inherited property should have been included as an asset, and not as a financial resource.

The Full Court of the Family Court agreed with the wife’s assertion, stating that:

“In our view it is wrong as a matter of principle to refer to any existing legal or equitable interests in property of the parties or either of them as ‘excluded’ from, or ‘immune’ from, consideration in applications for orders pursuant to s 79 [of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘The Act’)]”.

Essentially, what this means is that any property owned by a party to a breakdown of a relationship, either legally or equitably, will be included in the asset pool.  It then becomes a question of what contribution the other party may have made to that asset.  It is not correct to assume that it will be excluded and, consequently, that the ex-partner will receive no money as a result of that asset being inherited.

There are two approaches that a court can take when altering property interest.  Firstly, the court can consider a ‘global’ approach, which amounts to all of the assets being pooled, and subsequently divided in accordance with the principle set out in Sections 79(4) and 75(2) of the Act.  The other approach is an ‘asset by asset’ approach which, as the name suggests, amounts to each individual asset being divided between the parties in accordance with their respective contribution relevant to that asset.

Therefore, whilst an inherited property may be included in the asset pool, it is still open to the court to conclude that the other party made no contribution to it.  If the division of the asset is approached on an ‘asset by asset’ basis, the outcome would be that, despite its inclusion in the asset pool, the ex-partner would receive no entitlement to that property.

A grey area in relation to an inherited property may come about where a party has, throughout the course of the relationship, done work on a property which is later inherited – or if there has been intermingling of finances between the parties and their parents.  For this reason, it is crucial to obtain the advice of an Accredited Specialist in order to identify whether a party to a relationship breakdown has an actual entitlement to a share of a property – as opposed to whether or not that property would be included in the asset pool, as this question would seemingly have been answered in the judgement handed down in the matter of Holland & Holland.

If you would like to receive advice with respect to how it is that inheritance will be treated in your own family law matter, or what the entitlements of your ex-partner may be more generally, please don’t hesitate to get in contact with one of Coleman Greig’s Accredited Family Law Specialists.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Understanding roles in the strata scheme

A strata scheme is a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots which can be apartments, villas, offices, units or townhouses. This will be articulated in the strata plan.

Can i put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

The NSW Building Commission’s extraordinary powers

In late 2023, the NSW Government passed the Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 (Amendment Bill). The Amendment Bill established the NSW Building Commission and granted it extraordinary powers to enter construction sites, inspect work and take away information and materials.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers   |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230