Businesswoman hands using laptop with icon social media and social network, Marketing concept.

Family Law and social media, are they a match?

Madison Kelly ||

In a world seemingly ruled by technology and supported by social media, it comes as no surprise that digital and, specifically, social media-focused evidence can now be utilised by parties to family law matters.  With social media platforms such as FacebookTwitterInstagramSnapchat and LinkedIn granting users the capability to instantaneously publish essentially anything that they wish at the click of a button, it is not uncommon for posts to end up being relied upon as evidence in court proceedings.

With this in mind, it is crucial for parties to be aware that it is not just correspondence between their lawyers (or themselves, if self-represented) that may find its way into an Affidavit – social media evidence can often be a relatively quick and effective way of providing evidence in support of a disputed fact.  This is particularly relevant within the context of parenting cases, where the best interests of the child are of paramount concern.

Coleman Greig Family Law team suggests taking into account the below examples of circumstances wherein social media evidence may be relevant:

  • Where the conduct of the parties is an issue: Screenshots of posts, comments or messages showing derogatory comments regarding either the child or other party.
  • Where neglect or safety is an issue: Photographs of parents acting irresponsibly.
  • Where full and frank disclosure is not being provided: A LinkedIn account may show that a party either is, or has been employed somewhere that they had previously not disclosed;
  • Where financial struggles are asserted, or payments are not being met (e.g. spousal maintenance): Posts or photographs evidencing liquidity such as attending expensive activities or restaurants, holidays, purchasing new assets etc.
  • Where a party asserts that a de-facto relationship doesn’t exist: Photographs and posts evidencing that there was such a relationship (which, if discovered, invokes the jurisdiction of the family court to make orders).

The above examples illustrate how often a simple post or photograph can go directly to a contentious fact in issue, and can often, quite easily, either support or go against a party’s case.

It is also an offence, under section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) to publish “by other electronic means, or otherwise [disseminate] to the public or a section of the public” any account of anything that would identify a party to the proceedings, or a person who is related to, or associated with a party to the proceedings.

With this in mind, it is incredibly important that parties resist the urge to vent about their family law matters via posts on social media.

The above shows the power of digital evidence in today’s technologically-reliant world, and gives a good idea of the type of evidence that we may start to see make its way into the jurisdiction in the future.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this piece, or you require advice on your own matter, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with one of Coleman Greig’s Accredited Family Law Specialists.


Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.


More posts

Can i put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

The NSW Building Commission’s extraordinary powers

In late 2023, the NSW Government passed the Building Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 (Amendment Bill). The Amendment Bill established the NSW Building Commission and granted it extraordinary powers to enter construction sites, inspect work and take away information and materials.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers   |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230