Couple Having An Argument In Front Of Judge

Exclusive Occupation of Family Home after Separation

Jacob Smith ||

When a marriage or de facto relationship breaks down, some spouses find that it is practical, economic and easier on the children, to both continue to occupy the family home – albeit as a separated couple – until they have reached a final agreement, or obtained final orders, on parenting and property matters.

However, this is not always an option, or viable in circumstances where the breakdown of the relationship is particularly hostile, or there are issues of violence. It is also not ideal to stay living under the same roof, if the children are being exposed to continued argument and debate.

What if you cannot continue to occupy the family home together, and you want sole occupation of the family home pending a final resolution of all matters?

Ideally, the best approach at first instance, is to try and reach a practical agreement with your spouse by exploring sensible options, for example, can your spouse move in with their parents? However, if an agreement cannot be reached, or you are not in a position to negotiate because there are issues of family violence, you ought to seek advice about the option of applying to the Court for an exclusive occupation order to reside in the matrimonial home exclusively under the Family Law Act 1975 (the Act).

The Court has a wide discretion in deciding such cases. Whilst each case is determined on its own merits, facts and circumstances, in broad terms, the Court will usually take the following matters into consideration:

  • whether the application is reasonable or unnecessary;
  • the interests of any children;
  • the relationship between the parties;
  • the financial position of each party;
  • whether it is practical and financially possible for either party to obtain alternate accommodation;
  • any issues of family violence;
  • alternate options available to the parties, for example, temporarily moving in with parents or moving into an investment property;
  • convenience or hardship to either party of moving out; and,
  • any other matter that the Court considers relevant.

The Court is not restricted by the above list and will make whatever order it considers to be appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

If you have just separated, and require assistance on this issue, please contact a member of Coleman Greig’s Family Law team today, who would be more than happy to assist you.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Festive season: Managing public holiday work obligations

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

Employers should exercise caution when dismissing during probationary period

Can you dismiss an employee during the probationary period? Yes, but a recent case is a lesson in caution. The recent Federal Court decision of ‘Dabboussy v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils’ is a warning to employers to consider the importance of timing if dismissing an employee during probation.

The business impacts from the Government’s new cyber security laws

Cybercrime ‘is a multibillion-dollar industry that threatens the wellbeing and security of every Australian’. In an effort to combat the impact on businesses and individuals, the Australian Government has introduced cyber security legislative reforms into the Parliament.

A guide to intrafamily adoption

Adoption is the process where a parent’s legal rights for their child are transferred to another person. The formal adoption of a stepchild or close relative is known as intrafamily adoption.

Passenger movement and visa data-matching by the ATO

Heading overseas for work or a holiday? Taxation issues, including tax residency, should be on front of mind when departing from or arriving to Australia. Why? Because the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) can follow your footprints and, if you’re not careful, spring unexpected taxes on you.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230