Couple Having An Argument In Front Of Judge

Exclusive Occupation of Family Home after Separation

Jacob Smith ||

When a marriage or de facto relationship breaks down, some spouses find that it is practical, economic and easier on the children, to both continue to occupy the family home – albeit as a separated couple – until they have reached a final agreement, or obtained final orders, on parenting and property matters.

However, this is not always an option, or viable in circumstances where the breakdown of the relationship is particularly hostile, or there are issues of violence. It is also not ideal to stay living under the same roof, if the children are being exposed to continued argument and debate.

What if you cannot continue to occupy the family home together, and you want sole occupation of the family home pending a final resolution of all matters?

Ideally, the best approach at first instance, is to try and reach a practical agreement with your spouse by exploring sensible options, for example, can your spouse move in with their parents? However, if an agreement cannot be reached, or you are not in a position to negotiate because there are issues of family violence, you ought to seek advice about the option of applying to the Court for an exclusive occupation order to reside in the matrimonial home exclusively under the Family Law Act 1975 (the Act).

The Court has a wide discretion in deciding such cases. Whilst each case is determined on its own merits, facts and circumstances, in broad terms, the Court will usually take the following matters into consideration:

  • whether the application is reasonable or unnecessary;
  • the interests of any children;
  • the relationship between the parties;
  • the financial position of each party;
  • whether it is practical and financially possible for either party to obtain alternate accommodation;
  • any issues of family violence;
  • alternate options available to the parties, for example, temporarily moving in with parents or moving into an investment property;
  • convenience or hardship to either party of moving out; and,
  • any other matter that the Court considers relevant.

The Court is not restricted by the above list and will make whatever order it considers to be appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

If you have just separated, and require assistance on this issue, please contact a member of Coleman Greig’s Family Law team today, who would be more than happy to assist you.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

When do I need to pay termination entitlements?

While many modern awards state that termination entitlements are payable within 7 days of termination, recent case law has stressed that statutory entitlements must be paid on the day of termination.

How to get approval to renovate your apartment

Renovating your apartment can improve your quality of life and increase the value of your property. Conducting renovations without approval, however, can lead to significant unnecessary costs and stress.

Nuisance neighbours? Here’s what you can do

Have a neighbour whose dog won’t stop barking? Or perhaps one who frequently has loud late-night parties? Whether it’s parties or pets, or trees or fences, disputes with neighbours arise in a variety of different ways.

Five reasons a Family Lawyer is a NEED, not an option

The family law system has always been considered to be one of the friendliest for self-represented litigants. The Courtroom protocol is a little laxer, the jargon a little less heavy and the Court officials a little more understanding. So, you may ask – why the need for a family lawyer?

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230