Senior woman signing documents with her husband

What to Keep in Mind when Exercising your Option to Renew a Lease

Sarah Newman ||

The Supreme Court of NSW recently handed down a decision in the case of Kegran Pty Ltd v Warrik Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1357, which highlights a number of important steps for tenants to take in order to validly exercise their option to renew a lease.

The Plaintiff (Tenant) and the Defendant (Landlord) had entered into a lease agreement for a five-year term, with the option to renew for a further term of five years.

In 2014, the Tenant sought to exercise the option to renew in accordance with the terms of the lease.  The Tenant provided notice of its intention to exercise the option to the Landlord via an email.

The Landlord did not dispute its receipt of the email, however submitted that the email was not a sufficient method of service, thus the Tenant had not validly exercised its option to renew.


With reference to the case of Kavia Holdings Pty Ltd v Suntrack Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 716, the court stated that an email can indeed constitute a written notice.

In addition, the Supreme Court found that clause (19) of the lease, which was concerned with the sufficient service of notices was “facultative, not mandatory”.  In other words, the clause did not prescribe exclusive methods of service available to the tenant, and as such, the email was seen as a sufficient service of the notice to renew.

The court accepted that the Tenant had called and spoken with the Landlord several days after having served notice, likely bringing the email in question to the attention of the Landlord.  The court in turn saw this as evidence that the Landlord had successfully ‘received’ the notice.

Final outcome

The court held that the email was a valid exercise of the Lessee’s right to renew the lease, as it was addressed to the Director of the Lessor, and had been provided within the specified timeframe.
This particular case highlights that the valid exercising of an option relies significantly on the interpretation of the terms, when read within the context of the lease.  Whilst this case demonstrated that the email was a valid method of service, it is important to note that this is not always the case.

Subsequently, the court ordered the specific performance of the option to renew, meaning that the Lessor would be obliged to uphold its contractual duty to have the premises available for a further term, as stipulated in the lease agreement.

Key takeaways

Paramount to the decision in Kegran Pty Ltd v Warrik Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1357 was the interpretation of the terms of the lease.  This brings to the forefront the fact that it is crucial for tenants and landlords alike to keep in mind that it is essential for options to be exercised in accordance with the terms of a lease.

To avoid unnecessary proceedings, as occurred in this particular matter, there are a number of essential rules that a tenant must be aware of when opting to exercise an option to renew a lease.

These include:

  • Service of the notice must take place within the timeframe specified within the lease;
  • For the notice to be effective, the lessee must clearly and unequivocally express the fact that they intend to exercise their option;
  • With the exception of the postal rule (where acceptance is made when the mail is sent, rather than when it is received), the notice of exercise must be received by the landlord in order for it to be validly exercised; and
  • The mode of service should be conducted in accordance with the guidelines specified within the lease.

It is important to remember that tenants have specific obligations when exercising an option to renew.  If you require assistance in negotiating a lease, or are seeking advice in relation to validly exercising an option, please don’t hesitate to get in contact with Coleman Greig’s Commercial Property Team:


Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.


More posts

SafeWork NSW
SafeWork NSW releases new strategy to address psychosocial hazards

On 22 May 2024 SafeWork NSW introduced a new strategy to address psychological and psychosocial hazards. The SafeWork NSW Psychological Health and Safety Strategy 2024-2026 establishes new supports for employers regarding their duties in preventing psychosocial harm in the workplace.

roles in the strata scheme
Understanding roles in the strata scheme

A strata scheme is a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots which can be apartments, villas, offices, units or townhouses. This will be articulated in the strata plan.

Airbnb home
Can I put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

liquidators required to seek approval
When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building
Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Dismiss an employee
Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

Phoenixing in Construction
New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230