Divorce agreement. Wife and husband can not make settlement

Property Co-ownership – Is It Right For You?

With reports of today’s high residential prices dominating both the Australian media and property market, potential homeowners and investors can be easily deterred from beginning the ascent onto the property ladder.  In response to this growing need for affordable real estate, there has been a notable surge in digital platforms offering ‘co-ownership’ solutions.  

Co-ownership agreements offer buyers who otherwise may not be able to afford the purchase of a property the opportunity to divide the costs with others.  However, while enticing, co-ownership can carry a multitude of potential risks.

Co-Ownership and the digital world

The increase in demand for co-ownership has led to the development of digital platforms specifically designed for processing co-ownership matters.

Digital platforms such as Kohab – labelled the ‘Tinder’ of the property marketplace, facilitate co-ownership agreements on a small and intimate scale, utilising ‘tenancy in common‘ agreements.  The platform’s process steers users through the key steps relating to co-ownership, such as allowing each party to have a defined share of the house.

Why Co-ownership might be for you

  • Co-ownership agreements can give potential buyers the means to overcome the obstacle of affordability, which is particularly inviting to those who otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford a foot in the door of the property market.  Affordability comes as a result of divvying up between co-owners the costs associated with purchasing a property, such as the purchase price and legal fees.
  • Co-ownership platforms such as Kohab assists buyers to purchase properties for co-living (occupation), co-investing and co-lifestyle (i.e. a shared holiday home), providing a wide range of sharing options.

Pitfalls of Co-Ownership

While the benefits of co-ownership may be attractive, there are a number of risks that must be considered before entering into an agreement, some of which include:

  • If one party wants to sell their share of the house, it can be particularly difficult to find a market of people willing to take over the resulting part ownership.
  • On the flipside, the remaining co-owners may have no control over who the incoming partner may be, limiting their preferences on how the property should be managed. 
  • A sour relationship between co-owners can be the downfall to a successful co-ownership agreement.  Possible disputes which may arise include those related to mortgage repayments, whether one party is willing to be bought out and whether to refinance.  Without a co-ownership agreement, it can be very costly to litigate that which was initially intended to occur between the co-owners.  
  • There are financial risks associated with co-ownership.  This is due to the fact that as co-borrowers, parties are jointly liable for each other’s debts. If you are considering becoming a co-owner of a property, Coleman Greig’s expert professional advice can deliver significant value in minimising any potential risks associated with your investment.  To organise an initial discussion with a lawyer in our Commercial Property Law team, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Elisha v Vision Australia Limited 2024

What happens where an employer ‘botches’ an investigation and dismissal process? A recent High Court case has shed some light…and provides a useful reminder about the importance of following due process.

The New Scam Prevention Framework and It’s Impact on Businesses

Many amendments to the Privacy Act stemming from changes to strengthen privacy protections for all Australians are now in force. However, the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 has attracted some criticism from businesses – particularly in relation to its statutory tort.

Who gets to keep “Max?”

For many, our animals have a special space in our hearts. So, it should be no surprise that It isn’t uncommon for a Judge to be asked to decide who keeps a beloved pet following a relationship breakdown.

Closing the loop – Criminalisation of intentional wage underpayments

Employers are gearing up for a run of public holidays. Provisions requiring an employee to work on a public holiday in certain circumstances have been commonplace and not overly concerning. However, the Federal Court recently held that such a provision contravened the National Employment Standards.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230