healthy finess young woman runner running on beautiful road

ACCC takes Lorna Jane to court

Malcolm Campbell ||

On 21 December 2020, the ACCC commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Lorna Jane over its “Anti-virus Activewear’ claims.

Lorna Jane made claims in July 2020, via its website, Instagram accounts, Facebook, in-store advertising and garment tags that the substance sprayed on its activewear called ‘LJ Shield’, eliminated and stopped the spread of COVID-19 and provided protection against viruses and pathogens, when this was not the case.   

The ACCC noted that most of the claims were removed in July, but until at least November 2020, Lorna Jane continued to represent on garment tags that the garment permanently protected the wearers against pathogens.

The ACCC alleges that Lorna Jane engaged in conduct that was:

  • misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive in contravention of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) (contained in Schedule 1 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth));
  • made false or misleading representations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had a standard or quality which it did not have in contravention of section 29 (1)(a) of the ACL;
  • made false or misleading presentations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had performance characteristics, uses and/or benefits which it did not have in contravention of section 29(1(g) of the ACL and engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public as to the nature, characteristics and/or suitability for the purpose of ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ in contravention of section 33 of the ACL. 

The ACCC is also alleging that Ms Lorna Jane Clarkson, the CEO of Lorna Jane was a party to or knowingly concerned in these contraventions.

The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, injunctions, correction notices and an order to implement a compliance program. 

The ACCC’s actions come off the back of the Therapeutic Goods Administration issuing an infringement notice of $39,360 against Lorna Jane back in July for similar claims.  

Whilst the matter is not yet finalised, it is a timely reminder that the ACCC has prioritised consumer and competition issues arising from the pandemic and the need for care to be taken when promoting and advertising products.  

We will continue to monitor and update you on the outcome of these proceedings.

If you have any questions or concerns relating to  any of the information in this blog or you require assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s Commercial Advice team, who would be more than happy to assist you

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

roles in the strata scheme
Understanding roles in the strata scheme

A strata scheme is a building or group of buildings that have been divided into lots which can be apartments, villas, offices, units or townhouses. This will be articulated in the strata plan.

Airbnb home
Can I put my home on Airbnb?

Airbnb is a form of short-term rental accommodation. To add your property to Airbnb in NSW, you are required to meet several laws and regulations governing short-term rentals.

liquidators required to seek approval
When are liquidators required to seek approval to retain legal counsel?

When does a liquidator (or the company he or she is appointed to) need court, creditor, or committee approval to validly retain a solicitor to act in a liquidation matter which is likely to extend for longer than three months?  The answer to this question has only recently been settled.

Proposed changes to building
Proposed changes to building and construction law in NSW

The Building Bill 2022 (the Bill) is the key avenue through which the NSW Government has proposed to reshape the culture of the building and construction industry by eliminating poor performance and improving the quality of building statewide.

Dismiss an employee
Can you dismiss an employee who fails to return to the office?

Slowly but surely, most employers are requiring employees to return to the office for at least a portion of their working week. Some employers continue to struggle with employees resistant to returning to the office or those who have an expectation that they can continue to work from home whenever it suits them.

Phoenixing in Construction
New powers to combat phoenixing in construction

The rise of phoenixing in the building and construction industry in Australia in recent years has proved a significant challenge to regulators. Mismanagement of time or cashflow can quickly propel businesses into insolvency.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230