healthy finess young woman runner running on beautiful road

ACCC takes Lorna Jane to court

Malcolm Campbell ||

On 21 December 2020, the ACCC commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Lorna Jane over its “Anti-virus Activewear’ claims.

Lorna Jane made claims in July 2020, via its website, Instagram accounts, Facebook, in-store advertising and garment tags that the substance sprayed on its activewear called ‘LJ Shield’, eliminated and stopped the spread of COVID-19 and provided protection against viruses and pathogens, when this was not the case.   

The ACCC noted that most of the claims were removed in July, but until at least November 2020, Lorna Jane continued to represent on garment tags that the garment permanently protected the wearers against pathogens.

The ACCC alleges that Lorna Jane engaged in conduct that was:

  • misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive in contravention of section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) (contained in Schedule 1 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth));
  • made false or misleading representations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had a standard or quality which it did not have in contravention of section 29 (1)(a) of the ACL;
  • made false or misleading presentations that ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ had performance characteristics, uses and/or benefits which it did not have in contravention of section 29(1(g) of the ACL and engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public as to the nature, characteristics and/or suitability for the purpose of ‘LJ Shield Activewear’ in contravention of section 33 of the ACL. 

The ACCC is also alleging that Ms Lorna Jane Clarkson, the CEO of Lorna Jane was a party to or knowingly concerned in these contraventions.

The ACCC is seeking declarations, penalties, injunctions, correction notices and an order to implement a compliance program. 

The ACCC’s actions come off the back of the Therapeutic Goods Administration issuing an infringement notice of $39,360 against Lorna Jane back in July for similar claims.  

Whilst the matter is not yet finalised, it is a timely reminder that the ACCC has prioritised consumer and competition issues arising from the pandemic and the need for care to be taken when promoting and advertising products.  

We will continue to monitor and update you on the outcome of these proceedings.

If you have any questions or concerns relating to  any of the information in this blog or you require assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch with a lawyer in Coleman Greig’s Commercial Advice team, who would be more than happy to assist you

Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and is not a substitute for legal advice. For more details, please read our full disclaimer.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

A father and daughter look at a tablet together
Changing a child’s name after separation

Separation can bring with it a range of emotions and the dispute between separating parents can be far and wide, including whether the surname of a child should be retained or changed.

Photo of a woman handing a child a bag
When child support doesn’t cover the costs – What you can do

In Australia, child support is governed by the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth). It is processed through Services Australia (Child Support) where a formulaic approach is taken to determine the amount of child support payable by one parent to the other.

A close up of a gavel
With or without you – Undefended hearings in Family Law

If a party has commenced family law proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (whether in relation to parenting or property matters) and the Respondent does not participate, the matter can, and eventually will, proceed without them.

Two horses in a paddock
Land tax exemption – Not as simple as you would think!

Land tax is an area that Revenue NSW is regularly targeting in their audits and investigations. In our Tax & Super practice, we have advised and worked with a number of clients on two common land tax exemptions – the principal place of residence exemption and the primary production exemption.

A young man and older man sit talking
The danger of oral agreements

A recent judgement delivered by the New South Wales District Court in Puntoriero v Higgins [2025] NSWDC 244 reminds us of the importance of documenting commercial transactions to prevent lengthy and costly litigation.

© 2025 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230