Real Estate concept, judge gavel / lawyer in auction with house model

Changes are on their way for the Australian Franchising Sector

Malcolm Campbell ||

In our earlier articles, we identified some of the key changes to the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes – Franchising) Regulation 2014 (the “Code”) that had been proposed by the Australian Government.

On the 22nd of February 2021, the first of these changes, in the form of the new Franchising Laws Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Bill 2020 (“the Bill”) passed the Senate.

The Bill comprises two schedules and seeks to:

  • enable the Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman (the Ombudsman) to appoint a mediation and franchising adviser to assist in resolving franchising disputes where mediation has failed, or where both parties agree to arbitration;
  • give the Ombudsman the power to assist with multi-party mediation and arbitration in franchising disputes where multiple parties have identical issues that require resolution; and,
  • increase the civil penalties provisions for breaching the Code.

Dispute Resolution

Schedule 1 of the Bill seeks to address the unique power imbalance in franchising by offering an optional binding alternative dispute resolution that is determined by an expert in that field.

In circumstances where mediation has failed or if both parties to a franchising dispute otherwise agree, the Bill would give the Ombudsman the power to assist with having the matter resolved by arbitration by establishing a mediation and franchising adviser with the power to appoint arbitrators to resolve disputes.

The Bill will also enable multi-party resolution of franchising disputes and give the Ombudsman power to assist with multi-party mediation and arbitration in franchising disputes. These amendments should ease the financial burden on individual franchisees with regard to initiating and resolving disputes and assist franchise networks where there are systemic issues within the network.

Penalties

Schedule 2 proposes to increase civil penalties for breaching the Code, where corporations that breach the Code must face maximum penalties which are the greater of the following:

  • $10,000,000;
  • If a court can determine the value of benefit that the body corporate, and any body corporate related to the body corporate, have obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the contravention – 3 times the value of that benefit; or,
  • If the court cannot determine the value of that benefit – 10% of the annual turnover of the body corporate during the 12-month period ending at the end of the month in which the contravention happened or began.

The amendments will significantly increase the quantum of penalties available for breach of the Code, to ensure the penalties are a meaningful deterrent.

Future Proposed Changes to the Franchising Code

The Australian Government has also finished consulting on an Exposure Draft of changes to the Code, with the majority of the draft changes to come into effect from 1 July 2021.

The Draft proposes many changes including:

  • improved access to an early exit for franchisees;
  • penalties for franchisors relating to marketing funds;
  • a restriction on retrospective variations;
  • a new prohibition on passing on unknown legal costs;
  • improved disclosure by franchisors;
  • new conciliation;
  • voluntary binding arbitration and doubled penalties;
  • a restriction on retrospective variations; and,
  • extra notice provisions for termination in “special circumstances”.

Coleman Greig will continue to monitor the implementation of the proposed reforms and provide updates as they arise, so please stay tuned.

If you have a query relating to any of the information in this article, or you would like to speak with an experienced franchising lawyer regarding your own franchising matter, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with a member of Coleman Greig’s Franchising team, who would be more than happy to assist you.

Share:

Send an enquiry

Any personal information you provide is collected pursuant to our Privacy Policy.

Categories
Archives
Author

More posts

Security of personal information

Part 3 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches where Special Counsel, John Bennett provides an overview of some court decisions and proceedings where ‘security’ of personal information has come into issue.

Parental alienation in Family Law

The concept, Parental Alienation Syndrome, was initially brought about by American psychiatrist Richard Gardner in 1985. The term parental alienation is used to describe a situation where one parent is involved in psychologically manipulating their child to turn against the other parent.

Are you liable for labour hire workers if they are injured?

Many employers (host employers) engage employees of labour hire companies, particularly in the building and construction, hospitality and manufacturing industries. However, what happens when one of these employees gets injured at the host employer’s work site? Who is liable for the injuries?

The risks with cyber attacks and data breaches

Part 1 of a four-part series on your business’ responsibilities related to cyber attacks and data breaches. Cyber attacks and data breaches are the top business risk in Australia according to Aon’s 2023 Global Risk Management Survey.

Help! My builder won’t finish the job – what do I do?

It’s normal for building projects to experience setbacks during construction.  However, in extreme cases your builder may suspend works and leave the site or disappear without explanation. This article will explain your available options if your builder won’t return to the site, and how to avoid the common pitfalls which may affect your rights against your builder.

Is your intellectual property secure?

Securing intellectual property (IP) is critical in today’s competitive and increasingly digital landscape. From innovative startups to established enterprises, big or small, safeguarding your business’ intellectual assets can help ensure sustained competitiveness, legal protection and set you up to capitalise on your unique creations.

Out with the old (section 260) and in with the new (Part IVA)

Part IVA overcomes deficiencies of section 260 of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA), exposed by judicial decisions. Part IVA was introduced, albeit with limitations on scope, to provide an appropriate balance between combatting tax avoidance without discouraging commercial and familial transactions.

© 2024 Coleman Greig Lawyers  |  Sitemap  |  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. ABN 73 125 176 230